Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T10:50:08.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

N. Yehuda Falk, Subjects and Universal Grammar: An explanatory theory (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. xix+237.

Review products

N. Yehuda Falk, Subjects and Universal Grammar: An explanatory theory (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. xix+237.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2008

Anna Siewierska
Anna Siewierska*
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
*
Author's address:Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YT, U.K.[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 530 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, D. Robert. 1984. Functional syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1997. Grammatical relations: An introduction. In Talmy, Givón (ed.) Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective, 1–84. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. (1997). Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology 1.3, 279–346.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of languages. In Charles, N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic, 459–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1977. Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. In Peter, Cole & Sadock, Jerrold M. eds. Syntax and semantics, vol. 8: Grammatical relations, 279–306. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy, J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar