Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:57:47.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moving along paths in space and time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2017

TUOMAS HUUMO
TUOMAS HUUMO*
Affiliation:
University of Turku & University of Tartu
*
Author’s address: Hämeenkatu 1, Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Languages, School of Languages and Translation Studies, 20014 University of Turku, Finland[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In cognitive linguistics, motion metaphors of time (e.g. Christmas is approaching, We left the crisis behind) have been actively studied during the last decades. In addition to motion verbs, prepositional expressions are an important element in such metaphors. This work combines insights from Cognitive Grammar and Conceptual Metaphor Theory to account for uses of English path prepositions in motion metaphors of time. It is argued that such expressions conceptualize time as a path where a mover is advancing. The nature of the mover varies: it can be an individual entity metaphorically in motion (e.g. We wentTHROUGHa hard winter), an extended period of time (e.g. The period of Daylight Saving Time goes onPASTSeptember), or the temporal profile of a process (e.g. I sleptTHROUGHthe afternoon). The nature of the mover correlates with the grammatical function of the path expression, which alternates between a complement of a motion verb and a free modifier. Accordingly, the time path can relate with figurative (motion-related) or veridical (duration-related) conceptualizations of time. While a spatial path is direction-neutral, a time path can, with few exceptions, only be scrutinized in the earlier $\rightarrow$ later direction.

Keywords

cognitive linguisticsEnglishmetaphormotionpathprepositiontime
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , 01 November 2018 , pp. 721 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

This research was funded by the Academy of Finland (Project 285739) and the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Grant 152335). I thank the three anonymous referees of Journal of Linguistics for their invaluable feedback on earlier versions of this work. I also thank Ellen Valle for correcting my English.

References

Bender, Andrea & Beller, Sieghard. 2014. Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition 132, 342–382.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1.3, 413–456.Google Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert. 1995. Family resemblance in the Dutch spatial prepositions doorand langs . Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3, 183–208.Google Scholar
Dewell, Robert D. 2007. Moving around: The role of the conceptualizer in semantic interpretation. Cognitive Linguistics 18.3, 383–415.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.3, 547–619.Google Scholar
Duffy, Sara & Feist, Michele. 2014. Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics 25.1, 29–54.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2004. The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and time: A cognitive linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [2nd edn., with a new foreword, published by Cambridge University Press, 1994]Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gawron, Jean Mark. 2007. Paths and the language of change. Ms., San Diego State University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250392505_Paths_and_the_Language_of_Change(accessed 5 December 2017).Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages (LINCOM studies in theoretical linguistics 3). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederieke. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2013. Many ways of moving along a path: What distinguishes prepositional and postpositional uses of Finnish path adpositions. Lingua 133, 319–335.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2017. The grammar of temporal motion: A Cognitive Grammar account of motion metaphors of time. Cognitive Linguistics 28.1, 1–43.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (Cognitive Linguistics Research 1). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29.2, 77–103.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2012. Linguistic manifestations of the space–time (dis)analogy. In Filipovic, Luna & Jaszczolt, Kasia (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures, vol. I: Linguistic diversity (Human Cognitive Processing 36), 191–216. Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, Seth. 2010. English prepositions explained, revised edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2011. Frames and the experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor. Constructions and Frames 3.1, 80–103.Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2014a. The spatial language of time (Human Cognitive Processing 42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin Ezra. 2014b. The two-Mover hypothesis and the significance of “direction of motion” in temporal metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12.2, 375–409.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English grammar (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The grammar of space (Typological Studies in Language 25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1997. Role and individual interpretations of change predicates. In Nuyts, Jan & Pederson, Eric (eds.), Language and conceptualization (Language, Culture, and Cognition 1), 116–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2007. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Hickmann, Maya & Robert, Stéphane (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (Typological Studies in Language 66), 207–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, Thora. 2007. Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, Thora. 2011. Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 704–722.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 739–779.Google Scholar