Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T20:41:04.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Margaret L. McLaughlin, Conversation: how talk is organised. (Sage Series in Interpersonal Communication. 3.) London: Sage, 1984. Pp. 295.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Deborah Cameron
Affiliation:
Dept. of English, Roehampton Institute.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken discourse, a model for analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1974). Some remarks on rule as a scientific concept. In Mischel, T. (ed.), Understanding other persons. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schlegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Lg 50. 696735.Google Scholar
Shimanoff, S. (1980). Communication rules, theory and research. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: the sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1981). On Grice's theory of conversation. In Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and discourse. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Winch, P. (1958). The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar