We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Malcom Coulthard & Alison Johnson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics). London: Routledge, 2010. Pp. xxvii+673.
Review products
Malcom Coulthard & Alison Johnson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics). London: Routledge, 2010. Pp. xxvii+673.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
26 September 2011
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bench-Capon, Trevor & Sartor, Giovanni. 2003. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artificial Intelligence150.1–2, 97–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterill, Janet. 2000. Reading the rights: A cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility. Forensic Linguistics7.1, 4–26.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe C. 2005. Legal reasoning. In Holyoak, Keith J. & Morrison, Robert G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, 685–703. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Michael S. 2003. Dworkin's fallacy, or what the philosophy of language can't teach us about the law. Virginia Law Review89.8, 1897–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, John. 1988. Rumpole and the age of miracles. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Slapper, Gary & Kelly, David. 2011. The English legal system, 12th edn.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2008. Interpreting legal texts: What is, and what is not, special about the law. In Soames, Scott, Philosophical essays, vol. 1, 403–423. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sprack, John. 2006. A practical approach to criminal procedure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar