Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:25:34.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Karl Heinz Wagner, Generative grammatical studies in the Old English language. (Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek, II) Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag, 1969. Pp. 298.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Affiliation:
Committee on Linguistics, Stanford University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1972 , pp. 297 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. Mimeo. (avail, from Indiana Univ. Linguistics Club).Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1957). Some thoughts on the function of word order in Old English and Modern English. Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské University 6(A 5). 72–98.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967–1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. JL 3. 37–81, 3. 199–244, JL 4. 179–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. FL 6. 322–361.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. 171–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1971). On generative semantics. In Steinberg, D. D. & Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics; an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and psychology. 232–296. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1970). Palatals and umlaut in Old English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 13. 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1939). O tak Zvaném Aktuálnim Členění Větném (On the so-called functional sentence perspective). SaS 5. 171–174.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg 43. 393–436.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1958). The phonology of Old English: a structural sketch. Studies in Linguistics 13. 13–24.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming). A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar