Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:05:56.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Layer, The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. ix+ 186.

Review products

John Layer, The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. ix+ 186.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Francis Nolan
Francis Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , September 1982 , pp. 442 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. & Thorsen, N. (1980). Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 1979, Vol. 3. Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P., Remez, R. E. & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In Butterworth, B. (ed), Language production, Vol. 1. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1944). Simultaneous components in phonology. Lg 20. 181–205.Google Scholar
Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In Abercrombie, D. et al. (eds), In honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G. & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1971). Nasal harmony in Desano. LIn 2. 37–56.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Layer, J. (1976). The semiotic nature of phonetic data. York Papers in Linguistics 6. 55–62.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. J. (1980). The phonetic bases of speaker recognition. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (1980) On the physical interpretation of vowel quality: cinefluorographic and acoustic evidence. Journal of Phonetics 8. 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, J. & Nordström, P.-E. (1976). Raised and lowered larynx - the effect on vowel formant frequencies. Quarterly Progress and Status Report 2–3/1976, 35–9. Speech Transmission Laboratory, RIT Stockholm.Google Scholar
Wood, S. (1979). A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels. Journal of Phonetics 7. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar