We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler syntax (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition68, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, John A.1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.2004. Effciency and complexity in grammars. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian. 2006. Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Mobbs, Iain. 2008. ‘Functionalism’, the design of the language faculty, and (disharmonic) typology. Master's thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, Lynne M. & MacDonald, Maryellen C.. 2011. It's not just the Heavy NP: Relative phrase length modulates the production of heavy-NP shift. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research40, 177–187.Google Scholar