Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:51:45.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jerrold J. Katz & Paul M. Postal, An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. (Research Monographs, 26.) Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1964. Pp. xi + 178.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Lyons
John Lyons
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 8.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1966 , pp. 119 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 4.) 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964 a). The logical basis of linguistic theory. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 914–1008.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964 b). Current issues in linguistic theory. In Fodor & Katz (1964: 50–118).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964 c). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 38.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1965). Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 97–138.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (1964). The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). Syntax and the consumer. Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 17. 11–24. (Edited by C. I. J. M. Stuart.) Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hartung, W. (1964). Die Zusammengesetzten Sätze des Deutschen. (Studia Grammatica, 4.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Heidolph, K. E. (1964). Einfacher Satz und Kernsatz im Deutschen. Acta Linguistica 14. 97–109.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1964). On some recent claims in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1964). Analyticity and contradiction in natural language. In Fodor & Katz (1964: 519–43).Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Lg. 39. 170–210. (Reprinted in Fodor & Katz ( 1964: 479–518).)Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. (1964). Negation in English. In Fodor & Katz (1964: 246–323).Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University & The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1962). Review of Trends in European and American Linguistics. American Anthropologist 64. 1118–24.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1963). Structural Semantics. (Philological Society Publications, 20.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. (1964). Kernel and non-kernel sentences in transformational grammar. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton. 692–6.Google Scholar