We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds) Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Ph.D. thesis, M.I.T.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. In Thomason, R. (ed.) New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (to appear). Ordered entailments: an alternative to presuppositional theories. In Oh, C. K. (ed.), Syntax and semantics: presuppositions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar