Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:37:27.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incorporation in Universal Grammar: a case study in theoretical reductionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Robert D. Van Valin Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 685 Baldy Hall, Buffalo,NY 14260, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, B., Gardiner, D. & Frantz, D. (1984). Noun incorporation in Southern Tiwa. IJAL 50. 292311.Google Scholar
Boas, F. & Deloria, E. (1941). Dakota grammar. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 2nd memoir, vol. 23. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds) Language acquisition: the state of art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 319346.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P. (eds), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn. 184221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). On the representation of form and function. The Linguistic Review 1. 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1972). The Dyirbal language of north Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. (1990). Noun incorporation, grammatical relations and valency change in Mayali. Unpublished ms, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1991). On the syntax of argument structure: categories and projections. Talk given at Arguments and Concepts workshop, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1946). From morpheme to utterance. Lg 22. 161183.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1957). Cooccurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Lg 33. 283340.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1987). Emergent grammar. BLS 13. 139157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, K. (1991). Possessor stranding in Oneida. LIn 22. 756761.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. (1982). Grammatical relations and clause structure in Malayalam. In Bresnan, J. (ed.) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 504589.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. BLS 4. 157189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. (1911). The problem of noun incorporation in American Indian languages. American Anthropologist 13. 250282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, H.-J. (1984). The pragmatics of noun incorporation in Eastern Cushitic languages. In Plank, F. (ed.) Objects: towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press. 243268.Google Scholar
Speas, M. (1986). Adjunctions and projections in syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Travis, L. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. (1987). The role of government in the grammar of head-marking languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 53. 371397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. (1990). Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Lg 66. 221260.Google Scholar
Walton, C. (1986). Sama verbal semantics: classification, derivation and inflection. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. (1984). Studies in Lakhota Grammar. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar