Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:13:42.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Support of extrinsic ordering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Robert M. Vago
Robert M. Vago
Affiliation:
Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Most versions of generative phonological theory contain a provision for restricting the ordering of rules in the grammar of individual languages.1 The use of language particular, or extrinsic, ordering statements has recently been challenged by Koutsoudas, Sanders & Noll (1974). These authors propose an alternative theory whose principal claim is that the ordering of rules follows from universal principles. Within this theory, which we may term the Unordered Rules Theory, a derivation proceeds as follows:

(i) (a) A representational string is checked against the structural descriptions of all the rules. If only one rule is applicable, then that rule is applied (optionally, in case the rule is optional); if two or more rules are applicable, then universal principles, such as (6) below, may enforce the applicational precedence of one rule over another rule; if the conditions of the universal sequencing principles are not satisfied, then the rules are applied simultaneously.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 25 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, L. (1973). Extrinsic ordering lives. Mimeographed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Cole, P. (1973).Mutual bleeding and the ordering of ponologicalrules.InKisseberth, C. W. (ed.), Studies in generative phonology. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1974). Constraints on global rules in phonology. Lg 50. 29–51.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R. (1972). Studies in Hungarian morphophonology. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 44. 106.Google Scholar
Iverson, G. K. (1973). A guide to sanguine relationships. Mimeographed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In Fujimura, O. (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. W. (1973). Is rule ordering necessary in phonology? In Kachru, B. et al. (eds), Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. (1973). Unordered rule hypotheses. Mimeographed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A. & Sanders, G. (1974). Constraints on neutralization and rule-ordering. Mimeographed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. & Noll, C. (1974). The application of phonological rules. Lg 50. 1–28.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. O. (1972). On arguments for rule ordering. FL 8. 266–273.Google Scholar
Ringen, C. O. (1973). Vacuous application, iterative application, reapplication, and the unordered rule hypothesis. Mimeographed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Vago, R. M. (1973). Abstract vowel harmony systems in Uralic and Altaic languages. Lg 49. 579–605.Google Scholar
Vago, R. M. (1974). Hungarian generative phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. (Mimeographed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.)Google Scholar
Vago, R. M. (1976). Theoretical implications of Hungarian vowel harmony. LIn 7. 243–263.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1973). Phonological concreteness in natural generative grammar. In Shuy, R. & Bailey, C. J. (eds), Toward tomorrow's linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar