Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T01:37:46.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In defence of systematic phonemics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Victoria A. Fromkin
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, W. S. (1962). Aspiration in the Harauti nominal. In Studia in linguistic analysis, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 6887.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1969). Syllables and redundancy rules in generative phonology. JL 6. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, C. E. (1969). Markedness, neutralization, and universal redundancy rules. Lg 45. 863885.Google Scholar
Cairns, C. E. (1970). Some comments on the formulation of morpheme structure constraints in markedness theory. Papers in Linguistics 2: 1. 4459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1968). The ordering of phonological rules. IJAL 34. 115136.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. W. (1970) On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 1. 3. 291306.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. and Fromkin, V. (1968). A phonology of Akan: Akuapem, Asante and Fante (WPP 9). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg 43. 393436.Google Scholar