Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:00:51.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

María Luisa Rivero  and
Arhonto Terzi
María Luisa Rivero
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa
Arhonto Terzi
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Imperative Vs with distinctive morphology either have a distinctive syntax (Modern Greek, Spanish), or distribute like others Vs (Serbo-Croatian, Ancient Greek). The contrast follows from properties of the root C. The first type has a strong Imperative V-feature in C, and under Chomsky's Greed Principle, Imperative Vs raise overtly to check this feature. The second type is the Wackernagel language, whose C hosts no features, but V-features are in I. If no phrase fronts, Vs move to C to support second position items. V-to-C affects all Vs, is last resort, follows Lasnik's Enlightened Self-Interest, and escapes Greed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , September 1995 , pp. 301 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bosque, Ignacio (1994). La negación y el PCV. In Demonte, Violeta (ed.) Gramática del Español. Publicaciones de la Nueva Revista de Filologia Hispánica, VI. Mexico, D.F: CELL, EI Colegio de Mexico. 167–200.Google Scholar
Beukema, Frits & Coopmans, Peter (1989). A Government-Binding perspective on the Imperative in English. Journal of Linguistics 25. 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Roberts, Ian (1991). Clause structure and X-Second. To appear in Chao, Wyn & Horrocks, Geoffrey (eds.) Levels of representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1993). A Minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Jay S. (eds) A view from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1994). Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard (1993). Principles and Parameters Theory. In Jacobs, Joachim, von, Stechow Armin, Sternefeld, Wolfgam & Vennemann, Theo (eds.) Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 506–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, Emilio (1992). Sintaxis y semántica de las formas modales en griego clásico. Revista Española de Lingūistica 22. 277–307.Google Scholar
Denniston, John Dewar (1954). The Greek particles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane (1994). The typology of syntactic positions: L-relatedness and the A/A' distinction. Ms., University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Halpern, Aaron Lars (1992). Topics in the placement and morphology of clitics. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison (1994). Viewing change in progress: the loss of V2 in Hiberno-English Imperatives. Ms., University of Ulster at Jordanstown. (Paper read at the 3rd Diachronic Syntax Conference, Amsterdam.)Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders (1986). Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerold J. & Postal, Paul (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. (1991). Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 647–686.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kudra, Danijela (1994). Object shift in Serbo-Croatian. Ms., University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar (1990). Negation in syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin (1968). Abstract Syntax and Latin complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard (1993). Lectures on Minimalist syntax. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics. Occasional Papers 1.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru (1992). Move alpha: conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lema, José & Rivero, María Luisa (1991). Types of verbal movement in Old Spanish: modals, futures, and perfects. Probus 3. 237–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop (1990). The A/A-bar distinction in movement theory. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer & Rosengren, Inger (1994). On the Subject of Imperatives. A Minimalist account of the Imperative Pronoun and Negated Imperatives. Ms., Lund University.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene (1993). V-movement and clitics in Modern Greek. Paper read at the First International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Reading.Google Scholar
Radanović-Koćić, Vesna (1988). The grammar of Serbo-Croatian clitics: a synchronic and diachronic perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa (1991). Long Head Movement and negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech. The Linguistic Review 8. 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa (1993). Long Head Movement vs. V2, and Null Subjects in Old Romance. Lingua 89. 113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa (1994a) [circulated in 1988]. Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 63–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa (1994b). Negation, Imperatives, and Wackernagel effects. Rivista di Linguistica 6.1. 91–118. (Special issue on Negation edited by Liliane, Haegeman.)Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa (1994c). Two locations for complement clitic pronouns: Bulgarian, Serbo-Croatian and Old Spanish. Forthcoming in Van, Kemenade Ans & Vincent, Nigel, (eds.) Inflection and syntax in language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (1990). Speculations on verb second. In Mascaró, Joan & Nespor, Marina (eds.)Grammar in progress. Dordrecht: Foris. 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (1991). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian (1992). Verbs and diachronic syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian (1994). Two types of Head Movement in Romance. In Hornstein, Norbert & Lightfoot, David, (eds.) Verb Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, Johan (1992). Romance enclitic ordering and Universal Grammar. The Linguistic Review 9. 219–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. (1970). On declarative sentences. In Jacobs, Roderick & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar. Boston, MA: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain (1992). Clitic placement, topic and the Wackernagel position in European Portuguese. In Rizzi, Luigi (ed.) Clitics in Romance and Germanic. Eurotyp Working Papers. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation. 103–139.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine (1988). On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 445–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur (1994).Agreement in Comp. The Linguistic Review 11. 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Herbert Weir (1920). A Greek grammar. New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar
Stenius, Erik (1967). Mood and language game. Synthese 17. 254–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann (1990). Clitics and configurationality in Ancient Greek. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto (1992). PRO in finite clauses: A study of the inflectional heads of the Balkan languages. Ph.D. dissertation, CUNY, New York.Google Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto (1994). Double Object clitics, their hosts, and their ordering. Ms., University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Triantafillides, Manolis (1974). Mikri Neoelleniki Grammatiki. Athens: OADB.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan (1992). A Topic position in Western Romance. In Kiss, Katalin E. (ed.) Discourse configurational languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan (1995). Some aspects of the syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 79–123.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob (1892). Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanischen Forschungen 1. 333–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webelhuth, Gerd (1992). Principles and parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Chris & Ćavar, Damir (1994). Word order variation, Verb Movement, and Economy principles. Studia Linguistica 48. 46–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1988).Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. In Dancy, Jonathan, Moravcsik, Judith M. E. & Taylor, Christopher C. W. (eds.) Human agency, language, duty and value. Stanford: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. (1990). Two Types Of Negative Markers. North East Linguistic Society 20. 517–530.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella (1994). Speculations on Negative Imperatives. Rivista di Linguistica 6.1. (Special issue on Negation edited by Liliane, Haegeman.)Google Scholar