Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:44:52.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How concrete is extrasyllabicity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jurgen Klausenburger
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1982). The analysis of French shwa. Lg 58. 534573.Google Scholar
Booij, G. E. (1983/1984). French C/Ø alterations, extrasyllabicity and lexical phonology. The Linguistic Review 3. 181207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative view of the syllable. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. (1980). Automatic alternations in non-transformational phonology. Lg 56. 94125.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klausenburger, J. (1978). French linking phenomena: a natural generative analysis. Lg 54. 2140Google Scholar
Klausenburger, J. (1984). French liaison and linguistic theory. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1968). French phonology and morphology. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (1985). CV phonology and French consonants: a concrete approach. JL 21. 453457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, B. (1981). Concreteness in generative phonology: evidence from French. Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press.Google Scholar