Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:04:04.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A history of the LAGB: The first fifty years1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2009

RICHARD HUDSON
RICHARD HUDSON*
Affiliation:
University College London
*
Author's address: Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, LondonWC1E 6BT, UK[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since its foundation in 1959, the Linguistics Association of Great Britain has established itself as one of the three associations for UK linguistics, alongside the much older Philological Society and its own child, the British Association for Applied Linguistics, though the relations among the associations are not always clear and can be somewhat problematic. The LAGB's main characteristic has always been its annual or twice-yearly conferences with a focus on language structure, but it also has its own journal and has taken a lead in promoting linguistics to funding and educational authorities. The paper outlines these events and how the LAGB's internal organisation has evolved to deal with them, and ends with three choices that face the association in its second half-century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 1 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

Many people have helped to produce this article by providing information or documentation, or by helping to track down the archives, and I should like to thank them all: Sylvia Adamson, David Adger, Doug Arnold, Bob Borsley, Keith Brown, Grev Corbett, Aidan Coveney, David Crystal, Anne Cutler, Nigel Fabb, Caroline Heycock, Patrick Honeybone, Jim Hurford, Ewa Jaworska, Andrew Linn, John Lyons, Fiona Marshall, John Mountford, Frank Palmer, Ian Roberts, Paul Rowlett, Neil Smith, Maggie Tallerman, Peter Trudgill, Nigel Vincent, David Willis, Wim van der Wurff.

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, Jean. 2002. Jean Aitchison. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 1–13.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney. 2002. W. Sidney Allen. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 14–27.Google Scholar
Anon. 1988. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language (The Kingman Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Asher, R. E. 2002. R. E. Asher. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 28–42.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. & Ingham, Richard. 2002. Grow your own linguistics? On some applied linguists' views of the subject. Lingua 112, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. & Ingham, Richard. 2003. More on ‘some applied linguists’: A response to Stubbs. Lingua 113, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Keith & Law, Vivien (eds.) 2002. Linguistics in Britain: Personal histories. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Collinge, N. E. 2002. N. E. Collinge. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 67–77.Google Scholar
Cox, Brian. 1991. Cox on Cox: An English curriculum for the 1990s. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2002. David Crystal. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 91–103.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. M. A. K. Halliday. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 116–138.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2007. Language and education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Eric. 1987. Awareness of language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Eric. 1996. Thirty years of language teaching. London: CILT Publications.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1983. Linguistic equality (CLIE Working Paper 1). London: Committee for Linguistics in Education.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2004. Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics 40, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2007. How linguistics has influenced schools in England. Language & Linguistics Compass 1, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 2002. John Lyons. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 170–199.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 2006. William Sidney Allen, 1918–2004. Proceedings of the British Academy 138, 1–36.Google Scholar
Marshall, Fiona. 2004. Review of Linguistics in Britain: Personal histories, edited by Keith Brown and Vivien Law. Ms., http://linguistlist.org/issues/15/15-1555.html.Google Scholar
Marshall, Fiona. 2006. History of the Philological Society: The early years. http://www.philsoc.org.uk/history.asp.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter. 2002. Peter Matthews. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 200–212.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Rosamond. 1997. Notes on the history of the British Association for Applied Linguistics 1967–1997. British Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1994. Firth and the London School. In R. E., Asher (ed.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 1257–1260. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 2002. Frank Palmer. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 228–238.Google Scholar
Perera, Katharine. 1984. Children's writing and reading: Analysing classroom language. Oxford: B. Blackwell in association with A. Deutsch.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 2002. Randolph Quirk. In Brown, & Law, (eds.) 239–248.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert. 1985. Linguistics in 1984: Retrospect and prospect. In Neil, Smith (ed.) Linguistics and linguistic evidence, 1–17. Newcastle upon Tyne: Grevatt and Grevatt.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 1989. The twitter machine: Reflections on language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 2005. Language, frogs and savants: More linguistic problems, puzzles and polemics. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1986. Educational linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1989. The role of the linguist in the political and ideological context of national language planning. In Jill, Bourne & Tom, Bloor (eds.)Kingman and the linguists, 20–24. Birmingham: Committee for Linguistics in Education.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2002. On text and corpus analysis: A reply to Borsley and Ingham. Lingua 112, 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar