Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:31:14.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government: the long and short of it1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

David Lightfoot
David Lightfoot
Affiliation:
Linguistics Department, University of Maryland at College Park, nog Mill Building, College Park,Maryland 20742-4511,USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 185 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aoun, J. (1986). Generalized binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Aoun, J. & Li, A. (1989). Scope and constituency. LIn 20. 141–172.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., Hornstein, N., Weinberg, A. & Lightfoot, D. W. (1987). Two types of locality. LIn 18. 537–577.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and control. LIn 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1984). A-bar bound pro vs. variable. Ms, University of Venice.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1990). Two kinds of minimality. LIn 21. 467–470.Google Scholar
Godard, D. (1985). Propositions relatives, relations anaphoriques et prédication. Thèse d'Etat, Université de Paris 7.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D. W. (1991). On the nature of lexical government. In Freidin, R. (ed.) Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Weinberg, A. (1991). On the ECP. To appear in Webelhuth, G. (ed.) Government and Binding theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1985). On certain ECP effects in Spanish. Ms, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1981). ECP extensions. LIn 12. 93–133.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. & Saito, M. (1984). On the nature of proper government. LIn 15. 235–289.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. & Weinberg, A. (1988). Review article on Chomsky 1986. Language 64. 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obenauer, H. (1984). Études de syntaxe interrogative du français. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Raposo, E. & Uriagereka, J. (1990). Long-distance case assignment. LIn 21. 505–537.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1983). Inner islands. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (1985). Null operators and the theory of proper government. Ms, UCLA.Google Scholar