No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
George Cardona, Henry M. Hoenigswald & Alfred Senn (eds), Indo-European and Indo-Europeans – papers presented at the third Indo-European conference at the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971. Pp. x + 440.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974
References
REFERENCES
Benveniste, E. (1969). Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes I–II. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Devoto, G. (1936). Germanisch-lateinisch und Germanisch-oskisch-umbrisch. Festschrift H. Hirt II. 533–547.Google Scholar
Djahukian, J. B. (1969). Armenische Miszellen. Studia Classica et Orientalia Pagliaro, A., oblata II, Roma. 65–71.Google Scholar
Dowsett, C. J. F. (1964). Arm. tēr, tikin, tiezerk'. Mémorial du Cinquantenaire, École des langues orient, anc. de l'Institut-Catholique, Paris. 135–145.Google Scholar
Riemschneider, K. K. (1970). Babylonische Geburtsomina in hethitischer Übersetzung. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1948). Sur l'unité linguistique balto-slave. Études slaves et roumaines 1. 65–85, 150–173.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1964). Syncope in Greek and Indo-European and the nature of IE accent. Naples: Istituto Universitario Orientale.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1967). Slavjanskaja etimologija na indojevropejskom fone. Vja 4. 3–25 ( = Slavic etymology in relation to the IE background. Welt der Slaven 12. 267–295).Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1969). Si parentem puer verberit, ast olle plorassit. Festschrift für F. Altheim I, Berlin. 173–191.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1970). Review of Directions for historical linguistics, Lehmann, W. P. Malkiel, Y. (eds). Austin, 1969. General Linguistics 10. 121–132.Google Scholar