We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Baltin, M. (1982). A landing-site theory of movement rules. LIn13. 1–38.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P. (eds) Readings in transformational syntax. Waltham. Ginn.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. E. (1973). Constraints on phrase structure configurations. Stanford Occasional Papers In Linguistics3. 115–136.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. E. (1976). A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1974). Introduction to the X-bar convention. Mimeo, distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X¯ syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sag, I., Gazdar, G., Wasow, T., & Weisler, S., (1985). Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory3. 117–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. (1981). Numerals and quantifiers in X¯ syntax and their semantic interpretation. In Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., & Stokhof, M. (eds) Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.Google Scholar