Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:45:19.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Friederike Braun, Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 50.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988. Pp. xiv + 374.

Review products

Friederike Braun, Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 50.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988. Pp. xiv + 374.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jocelyne M. Vincent Marrelli
Jocelyne M. Vincent Marrelli
Affiliation:
Istituto Universitario Orientale di Napoli
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 265 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. & Benigni, L. (1975). Rules of address in Italy: a sociolinguistic survey. LiS. 4. 271–288.Google Scholar
Braun, F. & Schubert, K. (1986). Von unhöflichen Höflichkeitsformen, und was Höflichkeit eigentlich ist. SAIS Arbeitsberichte, (Kiel). 9. 1–29.Google Scholar
Braun, F., Kohz, A. & Schubert, K. (1986). Anredeforschung. Kommentierte Bibliographie zur Soziolinguistik der Anrede. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universal in language usage. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Ford, M. (1961). Address in American English. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62. 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in language. New York: Wiley. Reprinted in Giglioli, P. (ed.) (1972) Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 252–282.Google Scholar
Consoli, E. (1987). Rules of address in secondary schools in Catania: linguistic variation and its social/cultural value. LiS 16. 559–564.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds) Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 213–250.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1985). Power. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4: Discourse Analysis in society, Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.). London etc.: Academic Press. 61–82.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (ed.) (1984). The dynamics of speech accommodation. Int. J. Soc. Lang. 46.Google Scholar
Gilman, A. & Brown, R. (1958). Who says ‘tu’ to whom. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 15. 169–174.Google Scholar
Grimm, J. (1837). Deutsche Grammatik, Vol. 4. Göttingen: Dieterichsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (ed.) (1986). Intergroup communication. (The Social Psychology of Language 5.) London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Keshavarz, M. H. (1988). Forms of address in post-revolutionary Iranian Persian: a sociolinguistic analysis. LiS 17. 565–575.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, R. R. (1981). Non-kin forms of address in Hindi. Int. J., Soc. Lang. 32. 121–137.Google Scholar
Renzi, L. (1968). Mamaˇ, tataˇ, nene, ecc.: il sistema delle allocuzioni inverse in rumeno. Cultura Neolatina 28. 89–99.Google Scholar
Sgroi, S. C. (1981). II sistema dell'allocuzione, diretta e inversa, secondo il modello performativo. Lingua e Stile 16. 3–11.Google Scholar
Silverberg, W. V. (1940). On the psychological significance of Du and Sie. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 9. 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorrento, L. (1950). Sintassi romanza. Ricerche e prospettive. Varese: Istituto editoriale cisalpino.Google Scholar
Svennung, J. (1958). Anredeformen, Vergleichende Forschungen zur indirekten Anrede in der dritten Person und zum Nominativ für den Vokativ. (Acta Societatis Litterarum Humaniorum Regiae Upsaliensis 42.) Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell/Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, J. (1988). Notes on power and solidarity in bookshops: goals, roles and the functions of laughing. Aston, G. 1988 ed.: Negotiating service: studies in the discourse of bookshop encounters. The PIXI project. Bologna: C.L.U.E.B. 234–265.Google Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, J. (1989). On cross-purposes in cross-talk. II muro del linguaggio. Proceedings of the Xth Annual Meeting of the Associazione Italiana di Anglistica (AIA), Sorrento Oct. 1987. Naples: Intercontinentalia.Google Scholar
Winter, W. (ed.) (1984). Anredeverhalten. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar