We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bach, E. & Partee, B. H. (1980). ‘Anaphora and semantic structure’. In Kreiman, J. & Ojeda, A. (eds.), Papers from the para-session on pronouns and anaphora. Chicago Linguistics Society. 1–28.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1980). Pronouns. LInII. 337–62.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & Sag, I. (1980). Passive and reflexive in phrase structure grammar. In Groenedijk, J., Janssen, T. & Stokhof, M. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hausser, R. (1979). How do pronouns denote? In Heny, F. & Schnelle, H. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 10, 93–142.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. & Cormack, A. (1981). Ambiguity and quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H. (1976). Remarks on Coreference. Linguistic Analysis2, 1–22.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1977). ‘The logic of demonstratives’ (mimeo).Google Scholar
Thomason, R. (ed.) (1974). Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press.Google Scholar