No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
E. E. David & P. B. Denes (eds.), Human communication: a unified view. (Inter-University Electronics Series, 15.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972. Pp. xviii + 456.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18eb5/18eb55bf85d964f50ab2c99d3d418f91558ed72c" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975
References
REFERENCES
Broad, D. J. (1972). Formants in automatic speech recognition, International journal of man-machine studies 4. 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forschungsbericht 68–6 (1968). Institut für Phonetik und Kommunikationsforschung, Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Jassem, W. (1971). Phonological segmental units in the speech signal. In Hammerich, L. L. et al. (eds.) Form and substance. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag. 181–189.Google Scholar
Jassem, W., Krzyśko, M. & Dyczkowski, A. (1971). Identyfikacja glosu przy zastosowaniu funkcji dyskryminacyjnych [Voice identification using discriminant functions]. Prace IPPT [IBTP Reports], 51.Google Scholar
Kosiel, U. (1973). Statistical analysis of speaker-dependent differences in the long-term average spectrum of Polish speech. In Jassem, W. (ed.) Speech analysis and synthesis 3. 181–208.Google Scholar
Krzyśko, M., Jassem, W. & Frackowiak-Richter, L. (1973). Statistical discrimination functions and their application to the problem of voice identification. In Jassem, W. (ed.) Speech analysis and synthesis 3. 143–158.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Vanderslice, R. (1967). The ‘voiceprint’ mystique. Working papers in phonetics, 7. UCLA. 126–142.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Nicely, P. E. (1952). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. JASA 24. 175–184.Google Scholar