Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:31:20.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dirk Geeraerts, Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. xix+341.

Review products

Dirk Geeraerts, Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. xix+341.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2011

M. Lynne Murphy
M. Lynne Murphy*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
*
Author's address:School of English, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QN, UK[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 231 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bierwisch, Manfred. 1983. Semantische und konzeptuelle Repräsentation lexikalischer Einheiten. In Motsch, Wolfgang & Ruzicka, Rudolf (eds.), Untersuchungen zur Semantik, 61–99. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Bierwisch, Manfred & Lang, Ewald (eds.), Dimensional adjectives, 71–261. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bréal, Michel. 1897. Essai de sémantique: science des significations. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Carnoy, Albert. 1927. La science des mots: traité de sémantique. Leuven: Editions Universitas.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane (ed.). 1998. WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 1998. Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mel'čuk, Igor A. 1970. Towards a functioning model of language. In Bierwisch, Manfred & Heidolph, Karl Erich (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 198–207. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mel'čuk, Igor A., Clas, André & Polguère, Alain. 1995. Introduction ´ la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire. Paris & Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus 9, 75–106.Google Scholar
Stern, Gustaf. 1931. Meaning and change of meaning, with special reference to the English language. Gothenberg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar
Trier, Jost. 1931. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes: Die Geschichte eines sprachlichen Feldes I. Von den Anfängen bis zum Beginn des 13. Jhdts. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Weisgerber, Leo. 1927. Die Bedeutungslehre: Ein Irrweg der Sprachwissenschaft? Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 15, 161–183.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic primitives. Translated by Anna Wierzbicka and John Besemeres. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar