Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:47:25.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diachrony and synchrony in word stress1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Iggy Roca
Iggy Roca
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Roca (1988) I take to task Harris (1983) and Den Os & Kager (1986) and propose a novel approach to Spanish (nonverbal) word stress according to which (i) the algorithm is not quantity sensitive and thus differs from that of Latin, the parent language, (ii) the system does not obey the Uniformity of Algorithm Principle, (iii) the algorithm operates on the morphological stem, rather than on the whole word. As regards (i), I made the suggestion (418, ibid.) that the preferred paroxytone stress in native forms with penultimate closed syllables must be formalized as a lexical prohibition on extra-metricality markings in the given environments. Clearly, the formalization of this proposal and the exploration of its consequences are central to the analysis. Moreover, while the arguments for a relaxation of the Uniformity of Algorithm Principle still stand, departures from the principle are doubtless costly and therefore best avoided. Finally, in Roca (1988) there is no discussion of the consequences of (iii) above for the cyclic data presented in Harris (1983), the compatibility of which with (iii) is consequently unclear. All these facts warrant a re-examination of the issue, which I propose to carry out in the present paper.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 133 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, D. (1984). Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology, PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1962). ‘Secondary stress’ in Spanish. Romance Philology 15. 273–279.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1987). Spanish epenthesis and stress. Working Papers in Linguistics 3. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington. 9–33.Google Scholar
Den Os, E. & Kager, R. (1986). Extrametricality and stress in Spanish and Italian. Lingua 69. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1976). Proto-Romance phonology. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1985). Speculations about the representation of words in memory. In Fromkin, V. S. (ed.) Phonetic linguistics. New York: Academic Press. 101–114.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Clements, G. N. (1983). Problem book in phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J. R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1975). Stress assignment rules in Spanish. In Milan, W. G., Sraczel, J. J. & Zamora, J. C. (eds) 1974 colloquium on Spanish and Portuguese linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 56–83.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1980). Nonconcatenative morphology and Spanish plurals. Journal of Linguistic Research 1. 15–31.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1985). Spanish word markers. In Nuessel, F. (ed.) Current issues in Spanish phonology and morphology. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Linguistics Club. 34–54.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1987). The accentual patterns of verb paradigms in Spanish. NLLT 5. 61–90.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. LIn 13. 227–276.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. G. (1988). Learning Spanish stress: developmental and theoretical perspectives. Lg 64. 683–706.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. & Terrell, T. (1976). Stress assignment in Spanish: a natural generative approach. Glossa 10. 64–110.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LIn 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1962). Manual de gramática histórica española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nuñez, R. (1988). Structure-preserving properties of an epenthetic rule in Spanish. In Birdsong, D. & Montreuil, J. P. (eds) Advances in Romance linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris. 319–335.Google Scholar
Otero, C. P. (1986). A unified metrical account of Spanish stress. In Brame, M., Contreras, H. & Newmeyer, F. J. (eds) A festschrift for Sol Soporta. Seattle, Wash.: Noit Amrofer. 299–332.Google Scholar
Roca, I. M. (1986). Secondary stress and metrical rhythm. Phonology Yearbook 3. 341–370.Google Scholar
Roca, I. M. (1988). Theoretical implications of Spanish word stress. LIn 19. 393–423.Google Scholar
Roca, I. M. (1989). The organisation of grammatical gender. Transactions of the Philological Society 87. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roca, I. M. (forthcoming). Constraining extrametricality. In Phonologica 1988. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segundo, S. (1988). Stress in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper read at the LAGB Autumn Meeting.Google Scholar
Solan, L. (1979). Spanish stress. In Lowenstamm, J. (ed.) University of Massachusetts Working Papers in Linguistics 4. Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Rule inversion. Lingua 29. 209–242.Google Scholar
Whitley, S. (1976). Stress in Spanish: two approaches. Lingua 39. 301–332.Google Scholar