Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:22:35.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Lebeaux, Where does binding theory apply? (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. Pp. xxiii+99.

Review products

David Lebeaux, Where does binding theory apply? (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. Pp. xxiii+99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

Cedric Boeckx
Cedric Boeckx*
Affiliation:
ICREA/Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
*
Author's address:Departament de Filologia Catalana, Facultat de Lletres, Edifici B, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 531 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 105–151. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel D., Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko & Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A Minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1972. Analyses of negation in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Safir, Ken. 2004a. The syntax of anaphora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Safir, Ken. 2004b. The syntax of (in)dependence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar