Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:43:13.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The categories of Modern Irish verbal inflection1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

PAOLO ACQUAVIVA
PAOLO ACQUAVIVA*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
*
Author's address: School of Languages and Literatures, University College Dublin, Newman Building, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper sets out to identify the categories underlying Irish verbal inflection and to explain why they have their observed morphological and semantic properties. Assuming that the semantic range of a tense is a function of the whole clause, it derives the tenses of Irish from three syntactic features. Their basic value and position in the clause, along with that of other independently justified formatives, determines the attested range of interpretations for each tense, while the way they are spelled out determines the observed morphological patterns. Since the analysis of verbal categories is based on their syntactic realization, the same explanation accounts for the paradigmatic structure of Irish conjugation and for various syntagmatic phenomena of contextual allomorphy. A language-specific investigation thus claims a broader theoretical significance as an exploration of the interconnected workings of syntax, morphology, and semantics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 537 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

I would like to thank Aidan Doyle, James McCloskey, Diarmuid Ó Sé, and two anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees for insightful comments which substantially improved this paper. Thanks also to the audience of the 6th Celtic Linguistics Conference (University College Dublin, 12 September 2010). All errors and omissions are my responsibility.

The following abbreviations are used in example glosses: 1, 2, 3 = first, second, third person; condit = conditional; cop = copula; def = definite article; DO = prefix realized as /d-/ or lenition; F = future/conditional suffix; fem = feminine; fut = future; gen = generic; hab = habitual; impers = impersonal; [L], [N]  = lenition, nasalization; m = masculine; nas = nasalization; neg = negation; pst = past; pl = plural; pres = present; prt = particle; sg = singular; vn = verbal noun.

References

REFERENCES

Acquaviva, Paolo. 1996. Irish negation and the representation of monotone decreasing quantifiers. In Borsley, Robert D. & Roberts, Ian (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective, 284–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2005. Roots and patterns: Hebrew morpho-syntax. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Armstrong, John. 1975. A note on initial mutation in Modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 6, 317–323.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. Statives, progressives, and habituals: Analogies and differences. Linguistics 32, 391–423.Google Scholar
Binnick, David. 1991. Time and the verb. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloch-Trojnar, Maria. 2006. Polyfunctionality in morphology: A study of verbal nouns in Modern Irish (Lublin Studies in Celtic Linguistics 3). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 1995. Non-verbal predication and head-movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew (ed.). 2011. Formal approaches to Celtic linguistics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Timberlake, Alan. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CO 2001 [1958] = Gramadach na Gaeilge agus litriú na Gaeilge: an caighdeán oifigiúil [Irish grammar and spelling: The official standard]. Dublin: Oifig an tSoláthair, Rialtas na hÉireann.Google Scholar
Cottell, Siobhán. 1995. The representation of Tense in Modern Irish, GenGenP 3, 105–124.Google Scholar
De Bhaldraithe, Tomás. 1977 [1953]. Gaeilge Chois Fhairrg: an Deilbhíocht [The Irish of Cois Fairrge: Morphology]. Dublin: Institiúid Ard-Léinn.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Miriam. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 157–186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doherty, Cathal. 1996. Clausal structure and the Modern Irish copula. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14, 1–46.Google Scholar
Doyle, Aidan. 2001. Irish. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Doyle, Aidan. 2002. Covert and overt pronominals in Irish (Lublin Studies in Celtic Linguistics 1). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Folium.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel. 1995. Particles and projections in Irish syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Alec, Marantz. (2008). Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39, 1–53.Google Scholar
Faust, Noam. 2011. Forme et fonction dans la morphologie nominale de l'hébreu moderne: études en morpho-syntaxe. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris Diderot.Google Scholar
GGBC = Liam Ó, hAnluain (ed.). Graiméar Gaeilge na mBráithre Críostaí [Irish grammar of the Christian Brothers]. Dublin: an Gúm.Google Scholar
Gorrie, Colin. 2011. Adjective agreement in Gaelic: A case for morphophonological features. In Carnie, (ed.), 321–335.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne. 1990. Functional categories and phase-structure parameters. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne. 2000. Tense and N-features in Irish. In Carnie, Andrew & Guilfoyle, Eithne (eds.), The syntax of verb-initial languages, 61–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Art. 1994. Gaeilge Uladh [Ulster Irish]. In , McCone et al. (eds.), 611–660.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 231–270.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mary R. 1977. A semantic analysis of Kikuyu tense and aspect. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71, 669–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LASID = Heinrich, Wagner (ed.). 1958–1969. Linguistic atlas and survey of Irish dialects. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro & Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. Aspect, adverbs, and events: Habituality vs. perfectivity. In Higginbotham, James, Pianesi, Fabio & Varzi, Achille (eds.), Speaking of events, 245–287. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro & Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2010. Iterativity vs. habituality (and gnomic imperfectivity). Ms., Scuola Normale Superiore. linguistica.sns.it/QLL/QLL10/Bertinetto-Lenci.pdf.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Dimitriadis, Alexis, Siegel, Laura, Surek-Clark, Clarissa & Williams, Alexander (eds.), 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2), 201–225.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85, 259–302.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1996. On the scope of verb raising in Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14, 47–104.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2001. The morphosyntax of wh-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37, 67–100.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2007. The grammar of autonomy in Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24, 825–857.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2009. The shape of Irish clauses. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2010. Polarity, ellipsis, and the construction of finite verbs. Presented at the second INFL workshop, Dublin, Dublin City University, 17 September 2010.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James & Hale, Ken. 1984. On the syntax of person–number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1, 487–534.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim. 1987. The Early Irish verb. Maynooth: an Sagart.Google Scholar
McCone, Kim, Damian, McManus, Cathal, Ó Háinle, Nicholas, Williams & Liam, Breatnach (eds.). 1994. Stair na Gaeilge: in ómós do Pádraig Ó Fiannachta [History of Irish: In honour of Pádraig Ó Fiannachta]. Maigh Nuad: Roinn na Sean-Ghaeilge, Coláiste Phádraig.Google Scholar
McManus, Damian. 1994. An Nua-Ghaeilge Chlasaiceach [Classical modern Irish]. In McCone, et al. (eds.), 335–445.Google Scholar
McQuillan, Peter. 2002. Modality and grammar: A history of the Irish subjunctive. Maynooth: Department of Old Irish, National University of Ireland, Maynooth.Google Scholar
Mezhevich, Ilana. 2008. A feature-theoretic account of tense and aspect in Russian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26, 359–401.Google Scholar
Ó Baoill, Dónal P. 1996. An teanga bheo: Gaeilge Uladh [The living language: The Irish of Ulster]. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
Ó Corráin, Ailbhe. 1992. On certain modal and aspectual values of the Future category in Irish. Journal of Celtic Linguistics 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Ó Donnchadha, Gearóid. 2010. Syntactic structure building and the verbal noun in Modern Irish: A minimalist approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Ó hUiginn, Ruairí. 1994. Gaeilge Chonnacht [Connacht Irish]. In McCone, et al. (eds.), 538–609.Google Scholar
Ó Sé, Diarmuid. 1990. Tense and mood in Irish copula sentences. Ériu 41, 61–75.Google Scholar
Ó Sé, Diarmuid. 1991. Verbal inflection in Modern Irish. Ériu 42, 61–81.Google Scholar
Ó Sé, Diarmuid. 2000. Gaeilge Chorca Dhuibhne [The Irish of Corca Dhuibhne]. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
Ó Sé, Diarmuid. 2001. Gnáthach agus leanúnach i mbriathar na Gaeilge [Habitual and progressive in the Irish verb]. In Ó Catháin, Brían & Ruairí, Ó hUiginn (eds.), Béalra: aistí ar theangeolaíocht na Gaeilge [Béalra: Essays on Irish linguistics], 123–145. Maynooth: An Sagart.Google Scholar
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish: Grammatical structure and dialectal variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál & Arndt, Wigger. 1983. Córas Fuaimeanna na Gaeilge [The sound pattern of Irish]. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Ard-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath.Google Scholar
Oda, Kenji. 2011. Preverbal particles and irregular verbs in Irish. In Carnie, (ed.), 229–253.Google Scholar
Oda, Kenji. 2012. Issues in the left periphery of Modern Irish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1998. Functional categories and Modern Greek syntax. The Linguistic Review 15, 159–186.Google Scholar
Quin, Ernest Gordon. 1974. The Irish modal preterite. Hermathena 117, 43–62.Google Scholar
Reed, Sylvia. 2011. The semantics of Scottish Gaelic tense and aspect. In Carnie, (ed.), 255–279.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Amsterdam: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 2007. The syntactic expression of Tense. Lingua 117, 437–463.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, Verle. 2004. For-adverbials, frequentative aspect, and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12, 135–190.Google Scholar
Wagner, Heinrich. 1959. Das Verbum in den Sprachen der britischen Inseln. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wigger, Arndt. 1972. Preliminaries to a generative morphology of the modern Irish verb. Ériu 23, 163–213.Google Scholar