Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:56:41.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bruce L. Derwing, Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 10.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973. Pp. xii + 340.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

N. V. Smith
N. V. Smith
Affiliation:
University College, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , September 1975 , pp. 261 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caws, P. (1965). The philosophy of science: a systematic account. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Caws, P. (1969). The structure of discovery. Science 166. 3911. 1375–1380.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1967). Some general properties of phonological rules. Lg. 43. 102–125.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970) Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Fodor, J., Bever, T. & Garrett, M. (1974). The psychology of language. An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1959). The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1962). Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, N. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. H. (1967). Psychological aspects of the theory of syntax. Journal of Philosophy 64. 75–87.Google Scholar
Harman, G. H. (1973). Review of Chomsky, N. Language and mind. Lg. 49. 453–64.Google Scholar
Holton, G. & Roller, D. (1958). Foundations of modern physical science. New York: Addison-Wesley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1965). On some recent claims in phonological theory. FL 1. 13–34.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1948). Russian conjugation. Word 4. 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). How abstract is phonology? Indiana University Linguistics Club (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1971). Historical Linguistics. In Dingwall, W. O. (ed.) A survey of linguistic science. College Park, Md.: University of Maryland. 576–649.Google Scholar
Lightner, T. M. (1965). Segmental phonology of Modern Standard Russian. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (dissertation).Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Rule inversion. Lingua 29. 209–42.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.) Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 93–195.Google Scholar