Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:10:11.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bolinger's challenge: melody, meaning and emotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Geoff Lindsey
Geoff Lindsey
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, Adam Ferguson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 179 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In Greenberg, J. P., Ferguson, C. A. & Moravcsik, E. A. (eds), Universals of human language. Volume 2: Phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 471–524.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1982). Intonation and its parts. Lg 58. 505–533.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts: melody in spoken English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1975). Discourse intonation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Department of English.Google Scholar
Clark, B. & Lindsey, G. (1990). Intonation, grammar and utterance interpretation: evidence from English exclamatory inversions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 32–51.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, D. (1987). On the scope of grammatical theory. In Modgil, S. & Modgil, C. (eds), Noam Chomsky: consensus and controversy. Falmer: Barcombe. 119–141.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1983). A semantic analysis of the nuclear tones of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Reprinted in Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C., Bolinger, D. & Keijsper, C. E. (1987). On accent. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1986). Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3. 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1987). Review of Bolinger (1986). Lg 63. 637–643.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1990). Intonation: emotion vs grammar. Review article on Bolinger (1989). Lg 66. 806–816.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist 39. 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerdahl, F. & Jackendoff, R. (1982). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindsey, G. (1985). Intonation and interrogation: tonal structure and the expression of a pragmatic function in English and other languages. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1983). Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisenzein, R. (1983). The Schachter theory of emotion: two decades later. Psychological Bulletin 94. 239–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sag, I. & Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational disambiguation of indirect speech acts. Papers from the 11th regional meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society. 487–497.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist 39. 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar