Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:49:23.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bettelou Los, Corrien Blom, Geert Booij, Marion Elenbaas & Ans van Kemenade, Morphosyntactic change: A comparative study of particles and prefixes (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. xiii+251.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2013

Marcel den Dikken
Marcel den Dikken*
Affiliation:
CUNY Graduate Center
*
Author's address: Linguistics Program, CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016-4309, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , November 2013 , pp. 703 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åfarli, Tor. 1985. Norwegian verb particle constructions as causative constructions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Corrien. 2005. Complex predicates in Dutch: Synchrony and diachrony. Ph.D. dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2002. Particle verbs in English: Syntax, information structure, and intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, Jackendoff, Ray, McIntyre, Andrew & Urban, Silke (eds.). 2002. Verb–particle explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion. 2007. The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb–particle combination. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1985. Principles of particle constructions. In Guéron, Jacqueline, Obenauer, Hans-Georg & Pollock, Jean-Yves (eds.), Grammatical representation, 101–140. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad. 1994. Complex predicates. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics/OTS.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 1996. The verb–particle alternation in the Scandinavian languages. Ms., University of Tromsø. [Available on LingBuzz, ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000046/current.pdf.]Google Scholar
Toivonen, Ida. 2002. Swedish particles and syntactic projection. In , Dehé et al. (eds.), 191–209.Google Scholar
Toivonen, Ida. 2003. Non-projecting words: A case study of Swedish particles. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Particle verbs and local domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2002. Particle verbs are heads and phrases. In , Dehé et al. (eds.), 233–267.Google Scholar