Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:50:53.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of varieties differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael Gregory
Michael Gregory
Affiliation:
English Department, Glendon College, York University, Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has been much discussion of intra-lingual varieties in recent years. Catford has pertinently stated the problem which has prompted this discussion and justified the need to solve it (1965:83): ‘The concept of a “whole language” is so vast and heterogeneous that it is not operationally useful for many linguistic purposes, descriptive, comparative and pedagogical. It is therefore desirable to have a framework of categories for the classification of “sub-languages” or varieties within a total language.’

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , October 1967 , pp. 177 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1955). English accents. The Speech Teacher 4. 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1963). Conversation and spoken prose. English Language Teaching 18. 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1956). Structure and system in Abaza. TPhS. 164–9.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1957). On the Linguistic Study of Languages. An Inaugural lecture delivered at Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bazell, C. E., Catford, J. C., Halliday, M. A. K., & Robins, R. H. (eds.) (1966). In Memory of J. R. Firth. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1961a). Generality, Gradience and the All-or-None. (Janua Linguarum, 14.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1961b). Syntactic blends and other matters. Lg. 37. 366–81.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1962). Language Varieties. A paper given to the Linguistic Association of Great Britain.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1964). On formal and contextual meaning. Acta Linguistica. 23–46. Budapest.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1965). What is Language? A New Approach to Linguistic Description. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1959). On Poetry and Poets. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. O. (1965). Linguistic sociology and institutional linguistics. Linguistics 19. 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. O. (1966). On contextual meaning. In Bazell et al. (1966).Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E., Spencer, J. W., & Gregory, M. J. (1964). Linguistics and Style. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1930). Speech. London: Benn. (Reprinted in Firth, 1964.)Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1937). The Tongues of Men. London: Watts and Co. (Reprinted in Firth, 1964.)Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1950). Personality and language in society. The Sociological Review 42. 37–52 (Reprinted in Firth, 1957: 177–190.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1964). The Tongues of Men and Speech. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, W. N. (1958). The Structure of American English. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1940). American English Grammar. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1952). The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. H. (1932). The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. J. (1965). Old Bailey speech in ‘A Tale of Two Cities’. In A Review of English Literature 6. 42–55.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1959). The Language of the Chinese ‘Secret History of the Mongols’. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). Syntax and the consumer. In Stuart, C. I. J. M. (ed.) Report of the Fifteenth Annual (First International) Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics, 17). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown U.P. 11–24.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Handscombe, R. J. (1965). Topics of conversation and centres of interest in the speech of eleven and twelve year old children. The Nuffield Foundation Foreign Languages Teaching Materials Project. (Reports and Occasional Papers No. 8.)Google Scholar
Hill, A. A. (1958). Introduction to Linguistic Structures. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Janetta, P. E. (1966). An exploration of Pakistani immigrant labourers' exposure to the English of mill workers. (Unpublished Postgraduate Diploma in English as a Second Language dissertation, Leeds University.)Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1966). Indian English. A study in contextualisation. In Bazell et al.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Fodor, J. A. (1964). A reply to Dixon's A trend in Semantics'. Linguistics 3. 19–29.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1963). Structural Semantics. (Phil. Soc. Pub., 20). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1965). Saying. A Review of English Literature. 6. 9–20.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement 1 in Ogden, G. K. and Richards, I. A. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1935). Coral Gardens and Their Magic. New York: American Book Co.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1957). The Language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: A situational statement. Hesperis 44. 31–71.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1954, 1955, 1960). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. Parts 1–3. Glendale, California: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1955). Colloquial English and communication. In Evans, B. Ifor (ed.) Studies in Communication. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1962). The Use of English. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1964). English Language at A Level. A proposed syllabus and specimen paper in English Language Examining. H.M.S.O. Report. 64–69, of the Lockwood Committee.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1965). Descriptive statement and serial relationship. Lg. 41. 205–217.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1952). A problem in the statement of meanings. Lingua 3. 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1954). Linguistic class indicators in present day English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1956). U and Non-U: An essay in sociological linguistics. In Mitford, N. (ed.) Noblesse Oblige. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. W. & Gregory, M. J. (1964). An approach to the study of style. In Enkvist et al.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. W. (1965). A note on the ‘Steady Monologue of the Interiors’. A Review of English Literature 6. 32–41.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1962). Modern English Structure. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Strevens, P. D. (1964). Varieties of English. English Studies. 46. 1–10.Google Scholar
Warburg, J. (1961). The Best Chosen English. London: Communications Research Centre.Google Scholar