Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:59:11.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anthony Warner, Complementation in Middle English syntax and the methodology of historical syntax. London: Croom Helm, 1982. Pp. 266.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Suzanne Romaine
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Birmingham

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlqvist, Anders (ed.) (1982). Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Galway, April 6–10 1981. Amsterdam: John Benjamin B. V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D. (eds), Explanation in linguistics. The logical problem of language acquisition. London: Longman. 3276.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. (1982). The finite sentence in English and Swedish. Unpublished manuscript. English Department, Åbo Akademi, Finland.Google Scholar
Koster, J. (1978). Why subject sentences don't exist. In Keyser, S. J. (ed.). Recent transformational studies in European languages. LIn Monograph 3. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-historical linguistics: its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1982). The NP cycle. LIn 13. 277297.Google Scholar