Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:04:09.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An account of Old English stress1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

C. B. McCully  and
R. M. Hogg
C. B. McCully
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Manchester University
R. M. Hogg
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Manchester University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The phenomenon of stress in Old English (OE) has been the subject of thorough and extensive study for well over a century. Indeed the foundation for any modern study remains the work of Eduard Sievers (1885, 1893a, b), well summarized in Campbell (1959). The present paper is not concerned with a revision of the ‘facts’ of Sievers' account, although we shall note below instances where we disagree with those facts, but rather with a linguistic explanation of those facts. Sievers' account is essentially a statistical presentation of varying stress patterns, and he made little attempt to provide explanations of either frequent patterns, or non-existent ones. The framework in which we shall operate is that of lexicalist metrical phonology. Within that framework we shall attempt to demonstrate that Old English stress was organized in a way very different from that in Modern English. Most particularly we shall suggest that there is a central rule (the Old English Stress Rule = OESR) which, in contrast to the central rule for present-day English (PDE), operated from left-to-right. This, we shall suggest, has direct implications for the operation of other features of stress derivations, such as Destressing. Further, we shall argue that it is probable that level-ordering has no role to play in the stress phonology of Old English.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1990 , pp. 315 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, M. R. (1978). Morphological investigations. Doctoral diss., University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Bliss, A. J. (1958). The metre of Beowulf. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bliss, A. J. (1962). Old English metre. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Creed, R. P. (1966). A new approach to the rhythm of Beowulf. PMLA 81. 23–33.Google Scholar
Danielsson, B. (1948). Studies on the accentuation of polysyllabic Latin, Greek, and Romance loan-words in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11. 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daunt, M. (1946). Old English verse and English speech rhythm. Transactions of the Philological Society. 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1980). On stress-timing in English phonology. Lingua 51. 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1981). Zero syllables in metrical theory. In Dressler, et al. (eds.) Phonologica 1980. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Gussmann, E. (1988). Review of Mohanan K. P. (1986). JL 24. 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1987). Why phonological strata should not include affixation. Unpublished MS, MIT., cited in Gussmann (1988).Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Keyser, S. J. (1971). English stress: its form, its growth, and its role in verse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). Stress and the cycle. LIn 18. 45–84.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. Doctoral thesis, UCLA. Published (1988) New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. Doctoral thesis, MIT. Published (1985) New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. LIn 13. 227–276.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T., van der Hulst, H. & Moortgat, M. (eds.) (1981). Lexical grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. & McCully, C. B. (1987). Metrical phonology: a coursebook. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der & Smith, N. (eds.) (1982). The structure of phonological representations (Parts I and II). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In Seboek, T. A. (ed.), Style in language, 1960. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 350–377.Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J. & O'Neil, W. (1985). Rule generalization and optionality in language change. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LIn 10. 421–442.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In van der Hulst & Smith, 1982, Part I.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1983). Quantity, resolution and syllable geometry. Folia Linguistica Historica IV. 151–180.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LIn 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. München: Beck.Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. (1988a). The phonology of resolution in OE word-stress and metre. Autumn meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, Exeter.Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. (1988b). The phonology of English rhythm and metre, with special reference to Old English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. (1988c). Review of Russom (1987). Lingua 75. 379–383.Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. (1988d). Metrical templates and OE versecraft. Old and Middle English conference, Manchester.Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. (forthcoming). The phonology of resolution in OE. Revised and expanded version of (1988a). In Edinburgh studies in English language, vol. 2 (ed. F. Colman).Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. (in preparation). A template-based analysis of ‘D’ and ‘E’ type verses in Beowulf. Revised and expanded version of 1988d, including full statistics.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. (1949). Wulfstan's prose. Proceedings of the British Academy XXXV. 109–142.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Mossé, F. (1952). A handbook of Middle English. Baltimore: John Hopkins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russom, G. (1987). Old English metre and linguistic theory. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Siegel, D. (1974). Topics in English morphology. MIT diss. Published (1979) New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1885). Zur rhythmik des Germanischen alliterationsverses. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache X. 209–314, 451–545.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1893a). Altgermanische metrik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1893b). Angelsächsische Metrik. In Grundriss der Germanischen Philologie, ed. Paul, H. (vol. 2/1). Strassburg: Karl Trübner. 888–893.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1970). A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Suphi, M. (1985). Non-linear analysis in English historical phonology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Suphi, M. (1988) Old English stress assignment. Lingua 75. 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar