Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:39:12.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allegro rules in colloquial Thai: some thoughts on process phonology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ken Lodge
Ken Lodge
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As part of an investigation into rapid speech and its rule-based processes, I want to present an analysis of colloquial spoken Thai and show how different tempi can be related to one another. I also want to see whether the processes displayed by colloquial Thai fit into the general picture of phonological processes which has emerged over the past 15 years or so (roughly Stampe, 1969, onwards) within different theoretical frameworks. In particular I shall try to relate my findings to the increasingly accepted notions of richer phonological structure now being envisaged (e.g. Clements & Keyser, 1983 – tridimensional; Goldsmith, 1976 a & b – autosegmental; Liberman & Prince, 1977 and Kiparsky, 1979 – metrical; Anderson & Ewen, 1980, and Durand, 1986 a – dependency).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , September 1986 , pp. 331 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, A. S. (1972). Word-final stops in Thai. In Harris, J. G. & Noss, R. B. (eds), Tai phonetics and phonology. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1986). Suprasegmental dependencies. In Durand, (1986a). 55–133.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Durand, J. (1986). Dependency phonology. In Durand, (1986a). 1–54.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Ewen, C. J. (eds) (1980). Studies in dependency phonology. Ludwigsburg: Ludwigsburg Studies in Language & Linguistics, 4.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (1977). Phonological structure and the history of English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bee, P. (1975). Restricted phonology in certain Thai linker-syllables. In Harris, J. G. & Chamberlain, J. R. (eds), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M. (1979). Initial consonant cluster reduction as a function of age group in Bangkok Thai speakers. In Gething, T. W. & Liem Nguyen, Dang, (eds), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics no. 6. Canberra: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1972). Phonological rules and dialect variation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. (1976). Dead consonants or dead tones? In Gething, T. W., Harris, J. G. & Kullavanijaya, P. (eds), Tai linguistics in honor of Fang-Kuei Li. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, M. (1974). Metarules and universal constraints in phonological theory. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Linguists, Volume II. 909–924.Google Scholar
Chomsky, A. N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. E. (1981). Abstrsctness and explanation in phonology. In Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D. (eds), Explanation in linguistics. London: Longman. 76–115.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., Leodolter, R. & Chromec, E. (1972). Phonologische Schnellsprechregeln in der Wiener Umgangssprache. WLG 1. 1–29.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (ed.) (1986a). Dependency and non-linear phonology. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (1986b). French liaison, floating consonants and other matters in a dependency framework. In Durand, (1986a). 161–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, C. J. (1980). Aspects of phonological structure. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. T. (1976). A reanalysis of some phonological rules in Thai. In Gething, T. W., Harris, J. G. & Kullavanijaya, P., (eds), Tai linguistics in honor of Fang-Kuei Li. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German & English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1980). An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 3rd ed.London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976a). Autosegmental phonology. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976b). An overview of autosegmental phonology. LA 2. 23–68.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1985). Vowel harmony in Khalkha Mongolian, Yaka, Finnish and Hungarian. Phonology Yearbook 2. 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1985). Metrical constituent structure. Paper presented to the LAGB Phonology Workshop, Salford, April 1985.Google Scholar
Harris, J. G. (1972). Phonetic notes on some Siamese consonants. In Harris, J. G. & Noss, R. B. (eds), Tai phonetics and phonology. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. (1949/1970). Prosodies in Siamese. Reprinted in Palmer, F. R. (ed.), Prosodic analysis. London: OUP. 27–53.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. (1964). Marginalia to Siamese phonetic studies. In Abercrombie, D. (ed.), In honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. (1975). Phonetic description and phonological function: some reflections upon back unrounded vowels in Thai, Khmer and Vietnamese. In Harris, J. G. & Chamberlain, J. R. (eds), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1975). Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1964). An outline of English phonetics, 9th ed.Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LIn 10. 421–441.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1982). A course in phonetics, 2nd ed.New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984). Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LIn 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. (1983). The acquisition of phonology: a Stockport sample. Lingua 61. 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K. R., (1984). Studies in the phonology of colloquial English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. (1985). Some further observations on a dependency phonology of French. Paper presented to the Association of French Language Studies Conference, Oxford, 09 1985.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. (1986). The English velar fricative, dialect variation and dependency phonology. In Durand, (1986a). 269–279.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. (ms). An autosegmental account of German Umlaut. (Unpublished manuscript.)Google Scholar
Maran, L. R. (1973). Classificatory and phonetic festures: a note on their relationship. In Kenstowicz, M. J. & Kisseberth, C. W. (eds), Issues in phonological theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Noss, R. B. (1975). How useful are citation forms in synchronic Thai phonology? In Harris, J. G. & Chamberlain, J. R., (eds), Studies in Tai linguistics in honor of William J. Gedney. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (ed), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Peyasantiwong, P. (1979). Phonological reduction of some final particles in modern Thai. In Liem Nguyen, Dang (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistics Studies, Volume 4. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1943). Phonetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1984). On major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds), Language sound structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 107–136.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. (1957). Junction in spoken Burmese. In Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 104–138.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1969). The acquisition of phonetic representation. CLS 5. 443–454.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. Reprinted by IULC.Google Scholar
Tongkam, T. L. (1976). Relative durations of syllables in Siamese connected speech. In Gething, T. W., Harris, J. G. & Kullavanijaya, P. (eds), Tai linguistics in honor of Fang-Kuei Li. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Tuaycharoen, P. (1979). An account of speech development of a Thai child: from babbling to speech. In Thongkum, Th. L. et al. (eds), Studies in Tai and Mon-Khmer phonetics & phonology. In honour of E. J. A. Henderson. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische Berichte 18. 1–18.Google Scholar