Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:39:02.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wolfgang Kühlwein (ed.), Linguistics in Great Britain, vol. II: contemporary linguistics ( = English Texts, 5). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1970. Pp. viii + 156.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

E. F. K. Koerner
E. F. K. Koerner
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages, Simon Fraser University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1972 , pp. 342 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1965). Studies in phonetics and linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1953). Relationship in comparative linguistics. TPhs. 52–108.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1957). On the linguistic study of languages. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bazell, C. E. (1962). Meaning and the morpheme. Word 18. 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. J. (1960/1961). Levels analysis: J. R. Firth's theories of linguistic analysis. JCLA 6. 124–135, and 164–191.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1971). Prosodic and paralinguistic correlates of social categories. In Social anthropology and language (ASA Monograph 10). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1963). Linguistic science and logic. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1957). Zero in linguistic description. In Studies in linguistic analysis (Special volume of the Philological Society). 33–53. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Grammar, society and the noun. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies in linguistic analysis. 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1967). The phoneme, its nature and use. 3rd ed.Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Keller, R. E. (1968). Reflections on the study of German phonology. Forum for Modern Language Studies 4. 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1963). Structural semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: The University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning. 8th ed., repr. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1957). Linguistic hierarchy. Lingua 7. 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (ed.) (1968). Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (ed.) (1970). Prosodic analysis. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, T. B. W. (1960). Historical philology and linguistic science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1959). In defence of WP. TPhs, 116–144.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1963). General linguistics in Great Britain, 1930–1960. In Mohrmann, C. et al. (eds.) Trends in modern linguistics. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum. 11–37.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1968). Morphology and the methods of synchronic linguistics. Methodender Sprachwissenschaft, contributions by Schnelle, H. et al. Munich & Vienna: Oldenbourg. 65–88.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1958). Semantics at the crossroads. Repr. in Ullmann, S.Language and style. Oxford: Blackwell. 4–11.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1962). Semantics. An introduction to the science of meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar