We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Lg49. 765–793.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1978). Grammatical theory and metascience. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1983a). Review of J. Katz, Language and other abstract objects. Lingua60. 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1983b). Causality in linguistic theory. London: Croom Helm; Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1984). Concerning the ontological question in linguistics. Language and Communication4. 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1980). On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, T. (1983). What is a language?Language and Communication3. 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, J. (1977). On evaluating data concerning linguistic intuition. In Eckman, F. (ed.), Current themes in linguistics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. & Henze, D. (1967). The private-language problem. New York: Random House.Google Scholar