Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:40:52.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thematic predicates and the pragmatics of non-descriptive definition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Noel Burton-Roberts
Noel Burton-Roberts
Affiliation:
School of English, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The phenomenon that I describe in this paper is a specific class of indirectly conveyed meanings. The meanings involved are definitional, or partially definitional. Though conveyed by the utterance of sentences, they are not part of the meaning of those sentences. To begin with, I shall use the term ‘non-descriptive definition’ to refer to the act of conveying such a meaning by the utterance of a sentence that does not have that meaning. In due course, though, I shall refine the reference of that term.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 41 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allerton, D. (1978). The notion of givenness and its relations to presupposition and to theme. Lingua 44. 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, J. (1977). Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. & Kiefer, F. (1970). Remarks on definitions in natural language. In Kiefer, F. (ed.), Studies in syntax and semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Grimshaw, J. (1978). The syntax of free relatives in English. LIn: 9. 331–391.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. (1976). On the generic indefinite article. Lg 52. 427–448.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. (1977). Generic sentences and analyticity. Studies in Language 1. 155–196.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. (1984). Modality and implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 7. 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. (1985). Wittgenstein and pragmatics: ostensive and non-descriptive definition. Paper delivered at the International Pragmatics Conference, Viareggio, Italy (September 1985).Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. (ms). The real difference between a three-valued logic and a logic with truth gaps.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Steinberg & Jakobovits (eds).Google Scholar
Cooper, D. (1974). Presupposition. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Donellan, K. (1971). Reference and definite descriptions. In Steinberg & Jakobovits (eds).Google Scholar
Dowty, D., Wall, B. & Peters, S. (1981). Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. (1979). In defense of the truth value gap In Oh, C. K. & Dineen, D. (eds).Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1961). About. Mind 70. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. (1984). On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. In Landman, F. & Veltman, F. (eds.), Varieties of formal semantics. Amsterdam: Foris.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K. (1977). The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme: Part 2. JL 3. 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempson, R. (1975). Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics I and II. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1971). Tense and time reference in English. In Fillmore, C. & Langendoen, D. (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
McCawley, H. (1981). Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. & Pan, C. (1975). Inferring quantification in generic sentences. In Papers from the 11th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: 412–422.Google Scholar
Oh, C. K. & Dineen, D. (eds) (1979). Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1982). Pragmatics: an analysis of sentence topics. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind 14. 479–93.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1979). Ordered entailments: an alternative to presuppositional theories. In Oh, C. K. & Dineen, D. (eds).Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1982). Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension. In Smith, N. (ed.), Mutual knowledge. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1974). Attributives and interrogatives. In Munitz, M. & Unger, P. (eds.), Semantics and philosophy. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. & Jakobovits, L. (eds) 1971. Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind: 59. 320–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1971). Identifying reference and truth value. In Steinberg & Jakobovits (eds).Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1974). Subject and predicate in logic and grammar. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Taglicht, J. (1984). Message and emphasis. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1981). On Grice's Theory of conversation. In Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and discourse. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (PG) Philosophical grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (BB) The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (PI) Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar