Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:22:00.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

T. Gardner, Hauptströmungen der modernen Linguistik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973. Pp. 176. - C. Gutknecht & K.-U. Panther, Generative Linguistik – Ergebnisse moderner Sprachforschung. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1973. Pp. 173. - M. Immier, Generative Syntax – Generative Semantik. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1974. Pp. 227. - H. Krenn, Die grarnmatische Transformation. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1974. Pp. 330.

Review products

T. Gardner, Hauptströmungen der modernen Linguistik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973. Pp. 176.

C. Gutknecht & K.-U. Panther, Generative Linguistik – Ergebnisse moderner Sprachforschung. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1973. Pp. 173.

M. Immier, Generative Syntax – Generative Semantik. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1974. Pp. 227.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

D. J. Allerton
Affiliation:
Department of General Linguistics, University of Manchester.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. (1974). Syntactic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Burt, M. K. (1971). From deep to surface structure (an introduction to transformational syntax). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C. (1973). The semantic representation of manner adverbials. In Kraak, A. (ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1972–3. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1970). Three reasons for not deriving kill from ‘cause to die’. LIn I. 429438.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1975). What is surface Structure? In Heilmann, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists, Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1957). Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Lg 33. 283340.Google Scholar
Helbig, G. & Schenkel, W. (1973). Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben, 2nd ed. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. S. (1968). English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1970). Global rules. Lg 46. 627639.Google Scholar
Partee-Hall, B. (1971). On the requirement that transformations preserve meaning. In Fillmore, C. F. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Perimutter, D. M. (1970). Surface structure constraints in syntax. LIn I. 187255.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. et al. (1972). Grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1958). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar