Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:13:24.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should the passive transformation be obligatory?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael B. Kac
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 191094

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bach, E. (1964). An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kac, M. B. (forthcoming). Constituents, transformations and underlying structure.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Postal, P. M. (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar