We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Roger Lass, English phonology and phonological theory: synchronic and diachronic studies. (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 17.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Pp. xii + 241.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
28 November 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Carter, R. (1975). Some theoretical implications of the Great Vowel Shift. In Goyvaerts, D. L. & Pullum, G. K. (eds), Essays on the sound pattern of English. Ghent: Story-Scientia. 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. (1968). English pronunciation 1500–1700. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. (1976). Review of Lass & Anderson, 1975.York Papers in Linguistics6. 187–193.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & Anderson, J. M. (1975). Old English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1964). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1955). Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar