Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:53:24.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rodney Huddleston, An introduction to English transformational syntax. (English language series, 10.) London: Longman, 1976. Pp. xiii + 273.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Adrienne Lehrer
Adrienne Lehrer
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 1977 , pp. 322 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akmajian, A. & Wasow, T. (1975). The constituent structure of VP and Aux and the position of the verb be. Linguistic Analysis I. 203–247.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1971). On sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Lg 74. 257–281.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. (1976). Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (1974). Further remarks on the analysis of auxiliaries as main verbs. FL II. 215–229.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Lg 39. 170–210.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Postal, P. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic description. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1970). Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Peterson, T. (1974). Auxiliaries. LSci 30, 1–12.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1969a). Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Todd, W. (ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics. Evanston, Ill.: Great Expectations Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1969h). A proposed rule of tree pruning. In Reibel, D. & Schane, S. (eds), Modern studies in English. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. 288–299.Google Scholar
Steele, S. (in press). Aux as a universal category. In Greenberg, J. (ed), Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar