Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:39:59.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Richard M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. I: The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Pp. xxiii + 609.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Robert Stockwell  and
Donka Minkova
Robert Stockwell*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Donka Minkova*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Department of Linguistics, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90024, U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected]
Department of English, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , September 1994 , pp. 515 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, C. (1992). Old English and the syntactician: some remarks and a syntactician's guide to editions of the works of Ælfric. In Colman, F. (ed.) Evidence for Old English. Edinburgh: John Donald. 1–19.Google Scholar
Björkman, E. (1900–1902). Scandinavian loan-words in Middle English. (2 vols.) Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Cable, T. (1991). The English alliterative tradition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Danchev, A. (1976). On the phonemic and phonetic values of the short ea andeo digraphs in Old English. Sofia: Faculty of Letters.Google Scholar
Daunt, M. (1939). Old English sound changes reconsidered in relation to scribal tradition and practice. Transactions of the Philological Society. 108–137.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. E. & Lahiri, A.. (1991). The Germanic foot: metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 251–286.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1991). The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulk, R. (1992). A history of Old English meter. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, B. H. (1984). The historical implications of the Scandinavian element in English: a theoretical valuation. NOWELE 4. 53–95.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. (1988). On the impossibility of Old English dialectology. In Kastovsky, D. & Bauer, G. (eds.) Luick revisited. Tübingen: Gunther Narr. 183–203.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. (1992). A grammar of Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howell, R. (1991). Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, A. van. (1987). Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1992). Phonology and morphology. In Blake, N. (ed.) The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol. II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 23–155.Google Scholar
McCully, C. B. & Hogg, R. M. (1990). An account of Old English stress. Journal of Linguistics 26. 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkova, D. (1982). The environment for open syllable lengthening in Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3/1. 29–58.Google Scholar
Minkova, D. & Stockwell, R. P. (1994). Syllable weight, prosody, and meter in Old English. Diachronica II. 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. (1985). Old English syntax. (2 vols.) Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1986). Linguistic theory in America. (2nd ed.) Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Obst, W. (1987). Der Rhythmus des Beowulf: eine Akzent- und Takttheorie. (Anglistische Forschungen 187.) Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. et al. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1981). Transformational syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. (Published in 1986 as Infinite syntax. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Corporation.)Google Scholar
Sells, P. (1986). Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1993). On the evidence for bimoric vowels in early English. In Marie, J. van (ed.) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam 1991. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 315–325.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. & Barritt, C. W. (1951). Some Old English graphemic-phonemic correspondences: ae, ea and a. (Studies in linguistics, occasional papers monograph 4.) Norman, OK: Battenburg Press.Google Scholar
Suphi, M. (1988). Old English stress assignment. Lingua 75. 171–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1972). A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. (3 vols.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar