Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T08:02:26.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quasi-modals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Paul G. Chapin
Paul G. Chapin
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a lengthy footnote to his article ‘Pronominalization, negation, and the analysis of adverbs’ (1970) George Lakoff makes the following interesting observation:

All known selectional restrictions on the occurrence of lexical items are finite in scope. Usually they apply in the same sentence (subject–verb and verb–object selections) and sometimes one sentence away (verb–verb selections; i.e.force requires an activity verb in its complement) (160).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1973 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1967). An interpretive theory of pronouns and reflexives. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1971). On some questionable arguments about quantifiers and negation. Lg. 47.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (1968). The English verb: form and meanings, 2nd ed.Madison, Wisc.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kajita, M. (1968). A generative-transformational study of semi-auxiliaries in present-day American English. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1970). Pronominalization, negation, and the analysis of adverbs. In Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1970). Evidence for deep structure constraints in syntax. In Kiefer, F. (ed.), Studies in syntax and semantics, Volume 10 of Foundations: of language, supplementary series. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1969). Auxiliaries as main verbs. In Todd, W. (ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics, series one. Evanston, Illinois: Great Expectations Publishers.Google Scholar
Shopen, T. (1971). Caught in the act. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. University of Chicago.Google Scholar