Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:17:00.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems of selection in transformational grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

P. H. Matthews
P. H. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is concerned with two related problems. Briefly: how can we best handle, in a transformational grammar

(i) Restrictions on the collocability (Simon, 1953; Firth, 1957; Mitchell, 1958) of one word with another.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , April 1965 , pp. 35 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. (Janua Linguarum, No. 4.) ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1961a). On the notion “rule of grammar”. Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects. (Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 12.) Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. 6–24.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1961b). Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word 17. 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1962). A transformational approach to syntaz. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English. Austin: University of Texas. 134–158.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1963). The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 19. 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. (Special volume of the Philological Society.) Oxford: Blackwell. 1–32.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Lg. 28. 1–30.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1957). Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Lg. 33. 283–340.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. Jr., (1962). Review of Lees (1960). Word 18. 326–353.Google Scholar
Lees, R. B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalixations. (Publication 12 of the Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics.) IJAL 26. 3. Part II.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1963). Structural Semantics. (Philological Society Publication No. 20.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1961). Transformational Grammar. ArchL 13. 196–209.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1958). Synugmatic relations in linguistic analysis. TPhS. 101–118.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1964). Constituent Structure. (Publication 30 of the Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics). IJAL 30. 1. Part III.Google Scholar
Simon, H. F. (1953). Two substantive complexes in standard Chinese. BSOAS 15. 327–355.Google Scholar
Stoll, R. R. (1961). Sets, Logic and Axiomatic Theories. San Francisco and London: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar