Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:39:27.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonology and syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Carlos Gussenhoven
Carlos Gussenhoven
Affiliation:
Instituut Engels-Amerikaans, University of Nijmegen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , September 1986 , pp. 455 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berendsen, E. (1985). Tracing case in phonology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, J. (1979). Aspects of English prosody. Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1981). Two kinds of vowels, two kinds of rhythm. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts: melody in language. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Buxton, H. (1983). Temporal predictability in the perception of English speech. In Cutler, A. & Ladd, D. R. (eds.). Prosody: models and measurements. Berlin: Springer. 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. E. & Eady, S. J. (forthcoming). Metrical phonology in speech production. JML.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. J. & Donovan, A. (1980). Perceptual studies of speech rhythm: isochrony and intonation. In Simon, J. C. (ed.) Spoken language generation and understanding. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at Bonas, France, 1979. Dordrecht: Reidel. 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, A. & Darwin, C. J. (1979). The perceived rhythm of speech. Proceedings of the ninth international congress of phonetic sciences, vol. 2. Copenhagen. 268–274.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1956). The linguistic relevance of stress in English. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 9. 113–149. Reprinted in Jones, W. E. & Laver, J. (1973). Phonetics in linguistics: a book of readings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1984). Tone and accent in Tonga. In Clements, G. N. & Goldsmith, J. (eds.), Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone. Dordrecht: Foris. 20–51.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1983a). Stress shift in Dutch as a rhetorical device. Linguistics 21. 603–619. Reprinted in Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1983b). Focus, mode and the nucleus. JL 19. 377–417. Reprinted in Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. LIn 15. 33–74.Google Scholar
Huss, V. (1975). Neutralisierung englischer Akzentunterschiede in der Nachkontur. Phonetica 32. 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huss, V. (1978). English word stress in the post-nuclear position. Phonelica 35. 86–105.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaisse, E. M. (1985). Connected speech: on the relation between syntax and phonology. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.Google Scholar
King, H. V. (1970). On blocking the rules for contraction in English. LIn 1. 134–136.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LIn 10. 421–442.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the morning calm, edited by the Linguistic Society of Korea. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. LIn 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
Loots, M. (1983). Syntax and assimilation of voice in Dutch. In Van der Broecke, M. P. R., Van Heuven, V. J. & Zonneveld, W. (eds.), Studies for Antonie Cohen: sound structures. Dordrecht: Foris. 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, W. J. (1982). Phonological representation and action-at-a-distance. In Van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part II). Dordrecht: Foris. 121–158.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1983). Relating to the grid. LIn 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
Scott, N. C. (1939). An experiment in stress perception. Le Maître Phonétique 67. 44–45.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1972). The phrase phonology of English and French. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1978). On prosodie structure in relation to syntactic structure. In Fretheim, T. (ed.), Nordic prosody, vol. 11. Trondheim, TAPIR.Google Scholar
Slis, I. H. (1985). The voiced–voiceless distinction and assimilation of voice in Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1970). Auxiliary reduction in English. LIn 1. 323–350.Google Scholar