Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:42:09.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peter Trudgill, The social differentiation of English in Norwich. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 13.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974. Pp. X + 211.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Derek Bickerton
Derek Bickerton
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , September 1975 , pp. 299 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adorno, T. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1972). The patterning of language variation. In Bailey, R. W. & Robinson, J. L. (eds.) Varieties of present-day English. New York: Macmillan. 156–186.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1974). Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973a). The structure of polylectal grammars. In Shuy, R. W. (ed.) Sociolinguistics: current trends and prospects. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 17–42.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973b). The nature of a creole continuum. Lg. 49, 3. 640–669.Google Scholar
DeCamp, D. (1971). Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole continuum. In Hymes, D. (ed.) The pidginization and creolization of languages. London: Cambridge University Press. 349–370.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1967). The nature of phonological primes. FL. 3, 1–36.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). How abstract is phonology? Indiana University Linguistics Circle (mimeo).Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23, 30–87.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. New York: Columbia University (mimeo).Google Scholar
Warner, W. L. (1942). The status system of a modern community. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, W. L., Meeker, M. & Ellis, K. (1949). Social class in America. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1954). Is a structural dialectology possible? Word 10, 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar