Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:53:28.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perfect and other aspects in a case grammar of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

George L. Dillon
George L. Dillon
Affiliation:
Indiana University in Fort Wayne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the case grammars of English proposed by Charles J. Fillmore and John Anderson perfect aspect is scarcely mentioned. Fillmore explicitly relegates it to a ‘modality’ component separate from the core ‘proposition’. Progressive (be ing) has not fared so badly – non-occurrence with (be ing) is frequently used as a defining test of a [+state] feature in a clause – and the readings assigned it are fairly constant and independent of the features of clauses in which it occurs. A model which treats progressive as ‘added on’ to any [–state] clause does not seem to miss any obvious generalizations or leave unaccounted-for any major divergences in semantic interpretation. With (have en), however, readings vary considerably depending on the character of the clause and the task of paraphrasing the ‘meaning’ (have en) ‘adds to’ a clause has frustrated many a grammarian of English, especially those who try to link ‘completion’ to it. In what follows, I will argue that we do need a [completive] semantic feature, but that it should be introduced into Anderson's subcategorization rules (1971: 211) and is only peripherally related to the readings assigned (have en). Adding an ‘aspectual’ feature to the subcategorization rules is not without warrant, since such features as [state] and [direction location] can be said to be aspectual, at least in the broadest sense of the term (‘having to do with “the temporal distribution or contour” of the action’ - Hockett's definition cited in Lyons, 1968: 315). Clearly relevant to the expression of aspect in this broad sense are manner and degree (or extent) adverbials, especially what I will call ‘aspect-manner’ adverbials: slowly, evenly. The relation of some manner adverbials (‘agent-manner’) and agency has been recognized and somewhat belaboured, though the parallel relation of degree adverbials and ‘completion’ has not. Again, these forms, like (have en), have been regarded as peripheral to the basic core of features, though some dependency relation between ‘agent-manner’ and agent has been suggested.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , September 1973 , pp. 271 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. (1971). The grammar of case: towards a localistic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chapin, P. (1972). Review of Stockwell, et al. Integration of transformational theories of English syntax. Lg 48. 645–667.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1970). Types of lexical information. In Kiefer, F. (ed.) Studies in syntax and semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1971). Some problems for case grammar. In O‘Brien, R. (ed.), MSLL 24.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Available from Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1965/1970). Irregularity in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1969). Towards a semantic description of English. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1971). Tense and time reference in English. In Fillmore, C. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1965). A linguistic study of the English verb. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. A. (1972). The simplex-feature hypothesis. Available from Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P., Schachter, P. & Partee, B. H. (1968). Integration of transformational theories of English syntax. Available from the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, Va.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs, & Waterhouse, J. (1969). ‘Already’ and ‘yet’: a suppletive set of aspectmarkers? JL 5. 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. Closs Closs (1972). A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar