Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:29:49.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul Elbourne, Definite descriptions (Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. x + 251.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2014

Florian Schwarz
Florian Schwarz*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
*
Author's address: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, 619 Williams Hall, 255 S. 36th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 731 - 738
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Elbourne, Paul. 2005. Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul. 2008a. The argument from binding. Philosophical Perspectives 22, 47–68.Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul. 2008b. Demonstratives as individual concepts. Linguistics and Philosophy 31, 409–466.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1990. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 187–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1993. Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 1–43.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2011. Donkey anaphora: The view from sign language (ASL and LSF). Linguistics and Philosophy 34, 341–395.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2013. Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass 7, 534–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2004. Would you believe it? The King of France is back! (Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions). In Reimer, Marga & Bezuidenhout, Anne (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, 315–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2013. Descriptive relative clauses in Austro-Bavarian German. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 58, 157–189.Google Scholar