Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:23:01.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Östen Dahl, Topic and comment: a study in Russian and general transformational grammar. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis (Slavica Gothoburgensia, 4). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1969. Pp. iii + 53.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jan Firbas  and
Karel Pala
Jan Firbas
Affiliation:
Department of English and Department of GreekUniversity of Brno
Karel Pala
Affiliation:
Department of English and Department of GreekUniversity of Brno
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 91 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamec, P. (1962). K úloze sémantiky ve slovosledu [On the function of semantic structure in word order]. SlavP. 297–300.Google Scholar
Adamec, P. (1966). Porjadok slov v sovremennom russkom jazyke [Word order in contemporary Russian]. Prague: Rozpravy ČSAV. 76, 15.Google Scholar
Apresjan, J. D. (1967). Experimental'noje opisanije semantiki russkogo glagola. [An experimental description of the Russian verb.] Moscow.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1952). Linear modification. PMLA. 1117–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. & Dokulil, M. (1958). K tzv. významové a mluvnické stavbě věty [On the socalled semantic and grammatical structures of the sentence]. Prague: O vědeckém poznání soudobých jazyků [On the research into contemporary languages]. 231–246.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax. TLP 1. 225–240.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1966). The relation of centre and periphery as a language universal. TLP 2. 9–22.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1967). Order of elements and sentence intonation. In To honor Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton. 499–512.Google Scholar
Daneš, F. (1968). Some thoughts on the semantic structure of the sentence. Lingua 21, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1960). Greek word order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). Lexical entries for verbs. FL 4. 373–393.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1957). K otázce nezákladových podmětů v současné angličtině [On the problem of non-thematic subjects in contemporary English]. CMF 39. 32–42, 165–173.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1959). Thoughts on the communicative function of the verb in English, German and Czech. BSE 1, 39–68.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1962). Notes on the function of the sentence in the act of communication. SFFBU A 10. 133–148.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1964a). From comparative word order studies. BSE 4. 111–128.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1964b). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. TLP 1. 267–280.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1965). A note on transition proper in functional sentence analysis. PhP 8. 170–176.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1966). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. TLP 2. 239–254.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1967). It was yesterday that … SFFBU A 15. 141–145.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1968). On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verb as means of functional sentence perspective. BSE 7. 11–48.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1969). On the prosodic features of the modem English finite verb-object combination as means of functional sentence perspective. BSE 8. 49–59.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. JL 2. 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, H. W. (1969). Aspects of word order and its communicative function in English and German. JL 5. 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1924). Několik poznámek o funkci podměru v moderní angličtině [Some notes on the function of the subject in Modern English.] CMF 10. 244–248.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1928). On linguistic characterology, proposition. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes. Leiden. Republished in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics (1964). Compiled by Vachek, J.Bloomington: Indiana Univerity Press. 59–67.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1939). O tak zvaném aktuálním členění větném [On the so-called functional sentence perspective]. SS 171–174.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1941). Základní funkce pořádku slov v češtině [The basic function of word order in Czech]. SS 7. 169–180.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1943). Ze srovnávacích studií slovosledných [From comparative word order studies]. CMF 28. 181–190, 302–307.Google Scholar
Novák, P. (1959). O prostředcích aktuálního členění [On the means of functional sentence perspective]. AUC-Ph I. 9–15.Google Scholar
Pala, K. (1967). Otnošenije meždu porjadkom slov i aktual'nym členeniem v češskom jazyke. [The relation between word order and functional sentence perspective in Czech]. PBML 2. 51–64.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1965). Descriptive statement and serial relationship. Lg 41. 205–217.Google Scholar
Sgall, P. (1967). Functional sentence perspective in a generative description. PSML 2. 203–225.Google Scholar
Uhlířová, L. (1966). Some aspects of word order in categorial and transformational grammars. PSML 2. 159–166.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. (1966a). The linguistic school of Prague. An introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. (1966b). On the integration of the peripheral elements into the system of language. TLP 2. 23–37.Google Scholar