Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:48:09.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nominal agent incorporation in Indonesian*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John Myhill
John Myhill
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most important types of grammatical process in the languages of the world is that involving the intransitivization of a transitive verb and the deletion or demotion of its subject or direct object. The first such process to be analysed was passivization, involving the demotion of a transitive subject to an oblique role or its deletion altogether; this process is central to all linguistic theories and has been known as long as linguistics has been studied.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 111 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cartier, A. (1983). Strategies of the definite/indefinite patient in passive sentences. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Halim, A., Carrington, L. & Wurn, S.Canberra: ANU.Google Scholar
Churchward, C. M. (1953). Tongan grammar. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). The languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Dardjowidjojo, S. (1978). The semantic structures of the adversative ke-an verbs in Indonesian. In Udin, S. (ed.) Spectrum: essays presented to Sutan Takdir Alisjahbana, on his 70th birthday. Jakarta: Dian Dakyat. 107–124.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1979). On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. & Thompson, S. A. (1973). On the application of root transformations. LIn 4. 465–497.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1985). Ergativity in Western Austronesian: the Malay evidence. MS.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. A. (1984). The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Lg 60. 703–752.Google Scholar
Iskandar, N. S. (1964). Salah Pilih. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, W. H. Jr., (1969). The analog of the passive transformation in ergative-type languages. Reprinted in Nichols, J. & Woodbury, A. C. (eds), Grammar inside and outside the clause. Cambridge: University Press, 1985. 176–191.Google Scholar
Kalmár, I. (1979). The antipassive and grammatical relations in Eskimo. In Frans, Plank (ed.) Ergativity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J. (1946). Èrgantivnost' i stadial'nost' v jazyke. Izvestija Akademii Nauk Sojuza SSR, Fak. Lit. i Jaz. 5. 387–393.Google Scholar
Macdonald, R. R. & Dardjowidjojo, S. (1967). Indonesian reference grammar. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McCune, K. (1979). Passive function and the Indonesian passive. Oceanic Linguistics, 18. 119–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihardja, A. K. (1983). Atheis. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Lg 60. 847–894.Google Scholar
Rehg, K. L. (1981). Ponapean reference grammar. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. (1911). The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist n.s. 13. 250–282.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.) Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. 112–171.Google Scholar
Tur, P. A. (1962). Keluarga Gerilya. Jakarta: Nusantara.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. U. (1978). Indonesian readings. Ithaca: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar