Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:35:55.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negation through reduplication and tone: implications for the Lexical Functional Grammar/Paradigm Function Morphology interface1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2015

OLIVER BOND
OLIVER BOND*
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
*
Author’s address: Surrey Morphology Group, School of English and Languages, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphological marking of negation through verbal reduplication and tone is a typologically rare phenomenon attested in Eleme (Niger-Congo; Nigeria). Using Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) and Paradigm Function Morphology (PFM) to model first-hand data, I argue that reduplication is not a direct exponent of negation in Eleme, but an asemantic morphomic process, indirectly associated with the presence of a negative polarity feature in LFG’s m(orphological)-structure. While negative verb forms of this kind are typologically unusual, the data can be explained by independently motivated morphology-internal principles. The empirical facts thereby provide support for an m-structure, characterised by its own principles and rules, which interfaces with a bifurcated lexicon that separates content from form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , 01 July 2016 , pp. 277 - 310
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Stump, Gregory T.. 2004. Paradigms and periphrastic expressions. In Sadler & Spencer (eds.), 111–157.Google Scholar
Alsharif, Ahmad & Sadler, Louisa. 2009. Negation in Modern Standard Arabic: An LFG approach. In Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy (eds.), LFG09, 2–25. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications; http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/14/papers/lfg09alsharifsadler.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. & Bond, Oliver. 2003. Reduplication and negation in Eleme. Presented at the World Congress of African Linguistics 4, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ, 18 June 2003.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1992. Stems in Latin verbal morphology. In Aronoff, Mark (ed.), Morphology now, 5–32. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2006. Aspects of Eleme verbal morphosyntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2008. Multiple analytical perspectives of the Eleme Anterior-Perfective. Current issues in unity and diversity of languages: Collection of papers selected from the CIL 18 [CD-ROM], 1480–1496. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2010. Intra-paradigmatic variation in Eleme verbal agreement. Studies in Language 34.1, 1–35.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2012. Reduplication as an obligatory component (but not necessarily an exponent of negation) in negative constructions. Presented at the Linguistics Department Seminar Series, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, 24 May 2012.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver. 2013. Modelling reduplication as a canonical vs. non-canonical exponent of negation. Presented at the South East Morphology Meeting, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 25 January 2013.Google Scholar
Bond, Oliver & Flouraki, Maria. 2011. Reduplication as an exponent of negation in Eleme: an LFG analysis. Presented at 6th South of England LFG Meeting, SOAS, London, UK, 29 October 2011.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Chapman, Carol. 1997. Paradigms, pronominal inflection and periphrasis. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996, 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1998. Morphology competes with syntax: Explaining typological variation in weak crossover effects. In Barbosa, Pilar, Fox, Danny, Hagstrom, Paul, McGinnis, Martha & Pesetsky, David (eds.), Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax, 59–92. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17, 79–106.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics 34). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Nikolaeva, Irina. 2011. Objects and information structure: Agreement, casemarking and grammatical function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Universals of negative position. In Moravcsik, Edtih, Wirth, Jessica & Hammond, Michael (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, 93–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.2011a. Minor morphological means of signaling negation. In Dryer & Haspelmath (2011). http://wals.info/feature/143G.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.2011b. Negative morphemes. In Dryer & Haspelmath (2011). http://wals.info/chapter/112.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2011. The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library; http://wals.info.Google Scholar
Frank, Annette & Zaenen, Annie. 2002. Tense in LFG: Syntax and morphology. In Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe (eds.), How we say WHEN it happens: Contributions to the theory of temporal reference in natural language, 17–52. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Frank, Annette & Zaenen, Annie. 2004. Tense in LFG: Syntax and morphology. In Sadler & Spencer (eds.), 23–65.Google Scholar
Ikoro, Suanu. 1996. The Kana language. Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Niño, María-Eugenia. 1997. The multiple expression of inflectional information. In Corblin, Francis, Godard, Danièle & Marandin, Jean-Marie (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics, 127–150. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel. 1998. Constructive case: Evidence from Australian languages. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Bresnan, Joan. 2011. Lexical-Functional Grammar: Interactions between morphology and syntax. In Borsley, Robert D. & Böjars, Kersti (eds.), Non-transformational syntax: Formal and explicit models of grammar, 112–140. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nwí-Bàrí, W. K. 2002. Tèè–English dictionary. Tabtàb Tèè turé bu bèkéé. Port Harcourt: Onyoma Research Publications.Google Scholar
Payne, J. R. 1985. Negation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. I: Clause structure, 197–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Spencer, Andrew. 2001. Syntax and an exponent of morphological features. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2000, 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa & Spencer, Andrew (eds.). 2004. Projecting morphology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2000. Negation in Swedish: Where it’s not at. In Butt, Miriam & Holloway King, Tracy (eds.), LFG00, 244–263. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications; http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/5/lfg00.pdf.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2002. Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001, 147–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M. 2012. Reduction and maintenance of overabundance: A case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5, 183–207.Google Scholar
Toivonen, Ida. 2003. Non-projecting words: A case study of Swedish verb particles. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Wolff, Hans. 1964. Synopsis of the Ogoni languages. Journal of African Languages 3.1, 38–51.Google Scholar
Xanmagomedov, B. G. K. 1967. Tabasaranskij jazyk [The Tabassaran language]. Jazyki narodov SSSR [Languages of the peoples of the USSR], vol. IV, 545–561. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar