Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T19:20:40.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nature of phonological representation: evidence from breaking in Frisian1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Peter Tiersma
Peter Tiersma
Affiliation:
Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A thorough examination of the nature of the phonological portion of the lexicon must address at least two crucial issues. One has traditionally been termed the abstractness controversy, which concerns itself with the issue of the level of representation, or whether lexical entries are at a surface phonetic, phonemic, systematic phonemic, or some other level. The second issue deals with the unit of representation, or whether lexical entries are in the form of morphemes, words, or some of each.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 59 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amastae, J. (1978). A note on natural generative phonology and paradigm leveling. LIn 9. 291–294.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baxter, A. (1974). Some aspects of naturalness in phonological theory. Thesis: Oxford.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass: Ginn and Co. 184–221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., Ebeling, C. L., Fokkema, K. & van, Holk A. G. F. (1972). Fonologie van het Nederlands en het Fries. 's-Gravenhage: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
De, Graaf Tj. & Tiersma, P. (1980). Some phonetic aspects of breaking in Frisian. Phonetica 37. 109–120.Google Scholar
Donegan, P. & Stampe, D. (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen, D. (ed.), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press. 126–173.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. LIn 4. 3–16.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. (1974). The representation of non-productive alternation. In Anderson, J. & Jones, C. (eds.), Historical linguistics. Vol. II. Amsterdam: North Holland. 203–229.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. (1975). Suppletion in the representation of alternations. Diss: UCLA.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Lg 51. 639–671.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 171–204.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). Phonological representations. In Fujimura, O. (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC. 5–56.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1979). The phonological component as a parsing device. In Dinnsen, D. (ed), Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 174–201.Google Scholar
Leben, W. & Robinson, O. (1977). ‘Upside-down’ phonology. Lg 53. 1–20.Google Scholar
Markey, T. L. (1975 ). West Frisian –wV–/–jV– breaking: a Generative approach. Folia Linguistica 7. 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miedema, H. T. J. (1958). De nieuwfriese ‘breking’ en zijn verspreiding. Taal en Tongval 10. 148–156.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. (1972). Synchronic reflexes of diachronic phonological rules. Diss. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sipma, P. (1973). Phonology and Grammar of Modern West Frisian. (Publications of the Philological Society, No. 2.) Oxford: Blackwell. (Reprinted in 1966 by the Fryske, Akademy, Ljouwert, , The Netherlands.)Google Scholar
Stampe, D. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. IULC.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. (1978). Bidirectional leveling as evidence for relational rules. Lingua 45. 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, P. (1979a). Breaking in West Frisian: a historical and synchronic approach. Utrecht Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 23–66.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. (1979b). Aspects of the phonology of Frisian, based on the language of Grou. Meidieling No. 4 of the Frisian Program at the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, 1–210.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. (1980a). Some theoretical implications of stem alternations in Dutch diminutives and plurals. In Zonneveld, W., van, Coetsem F. & Robinson, O. (eds.), Studies in Dutch phonology. The Hague: Nijhoff. 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiersma, P. (1980b). The lexicon in phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Van, der Meer G. (1977). Frisian breaking: a hypothesis about its historical development. Us Wurk 26, 9–24.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Rule inversion. Lingua 29. 209–242.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974). Words and syllables in Natural Generative Grammar. In Bruck, A. et al. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on natural phonology. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 346–75.Google Scholar